Slavery was legal once
Does that mean it was once moral?

> Moral authority should stem from the people, not from government

Austism

You are implying the two aren't linked.

Of course they're linked

But they're not eqivalent

Do the electorate make laws or is it the judicial government?

Both

Of course the authority comes from the government - that is the whole point.

the authority comes from the people and flows to the government and its fro mthat authority that they make laws

in a democracy

"I wouldn't want government to be the final arbiter of morals
Looks what happens when you let it - leftism"
Liberalism led to that, for decades right-wingers in government dictated morality and it didn't result in leftism until after these regulations were removed

^

Liberalism allows leftism to flourish

Oh contrare, it happened with the right-wing in power

The right wing post WW1 were liberals

Lol

for example for decades the Americans dictated morality in films through laws from the 1920s till the 1960s, which prevented rapid degeneracy from spreading

only more subtle forms of Degeneracy were allowed

lmao what classifies as degeneracy

I thought classical liberalism is technically a right wing ideology? No?

no

whats the difference between rapid and subtle degeneracy i want example

Why on earth would it be right wing

ethnonationalism is subtle degeneracy

authoritarianism is subtle degeneracy

the degeneration of a free country i guess

obesity, feminism, social liberalism, LGBT ideology these are all common forms of degeneracy.

i agree with that statement, eth

Is regular nationalism degenerate?

What is regular nationalism

regular as in civic?

regular nationalism is ethnonationalism

not by itself, hopix

probably

Civic Nationalism is decadent, yes

Civic i I think

called it

Well done you

Nationalism is by definition ethnic

no

only in the sense that ethnicity is evolutionary in nature, caledonian

I disagree that ethno nationalism is necessary