Sargonites dont realise how much they agree with the status quo

I'd consider native to be anyone that's got ancestry of around 1000 or more years ago where they live

So we are undoubtedly native

thats a disingenuous twisting of language

Sargonites are 1 degree from "conservatism"

"Cheddar Man is a human male fossil found in Gough's Cave in Cheddar Gorge, Somerset, England. The skeletal remains date to the Mesolithic (ca. 9100 BP)"

not at all, the idea of nation and ethnicity being intertied was completely mainstream until the 1970s at least @Puggums

Sargonites deconstruct everything just as much as the left, whom they think they are fighting against

apparently BP is before 1st Jan 1950

lol what does the p stand for

even today that idea is still strong in much of Eastern Europe

Basing any theory on a sample size of 1 isn't a good thing, Wacka

"before present"

Paki

Thats not how the present works

Imagine thinking cheddarman was a nigger

Was he not?

well he was murdered... so there was at least 2 ppl 😛

hes a WHG and the skin tone of which can not be accurately ascertained

Nope, he was -thought- to have dark skin

@Ethreen42 so ad populum then, people believe it doesnt mean its right and tehres a lot of peopel especially in the UK who don't think that so what then

Lol

He could have just had a fucking tan. He could have been a traveller

I love how the guardian ran with that, yeah hes black bro

Cheddar man's skin colour is now thought to be much lighter than the model they produced

he was likely around the Mediterranean level

Of swarth

Having white skin is a result of long term occupation of places with lower levels of sunlight through the year

" dark to very dark skin"

It's not even difficult science

The university that created the model admitted they had no way of actually knowing what colour his skin was

lots of people can believe it doesn't mean a country defined by ethnicity and a common heritage if they like, those lots of people would simply be wrong @Puggums

It doesnt really matter either way

The authors are well known "antiracists"

which means they hate the idea of a resolute identity, particularly in europe

the theory goes, that women in lower sunlight areas had more brittle bones if they had darker skin

so women with ever so slightly lighter skin (even unnoticeable difference to the eye) would have been able to have perhaps even one more kid than darker skinned people before their hip breaks

and over generations people got lighter skin that could let through more UV/vitamin D to the bones

@Ethreen42 if there's no objective basis for it then at minimum you cant go around saying that tis one way or the other

There's an issue though, Puggums

Because of history, populations were isolated and didn't move or interbreed much except during conquests.
This means, throughout history, up until literally about 100 years ago (or even more recently), ethnicity and culture -are- inextricably linked

odam... missed PMQs ... anything spicy happen?