Doesn't appear to be so

Well its possible

LOL...
https://twitter.com/MattChorley/status/1227946141913886720?s=20

Liberals were like that when they were also racists 80 years ago

Not today

But yet again

The whigs were rather colour blind

Modern day liberals want to overcome race/genetics

Implying that's even possible or desirable

You can't circumvent human nature

Liberals and old school communists believe the same thing about race

the euro is now at 83p

last august it cost 93p for a euro

So you have to be racist to be a nationalist now? I think the far left would agree with you there.

a nationalist cares about the nation, regardless of race
a racist cares about race, regardless of the nation

a nationalist is the opposite of a racist

I dont know about that

> Priti Patel remains Home Secretary

If you care about your race, you simply have no choice but to believe in a nation for that race

Otherwise the security of your race is compromised

i dont think so

you're race can multiply and prosper without a nation

especially if you have a numbers advantage

That's true, but you might get genocided

Like Muslims in China

Or Tibetans in Tibet

Or anyone who isn't Han Chinese in China

Having a nation sure worked out for those folk

Well according to China Tibet never existed

They declared the treaty signed between the UK and Tibet invalid because Tibet isn't real, essentially

Communist revisionist scum

To them I mean

Classic commie tactics

It's common sense to say a nation of people is more secure than random enclaves spread across other nations

A nation of people doesn't have to be exclusive to single race unless your an ethno nat

There's not even a noticeable benefit

I think it's a given that a nation should share the same culture

> So you have to be racist to be a nationalist now? I think the far left would agree with you there.

Well they are correct. This is why they want to destroy nationalism.

Multi-ethnic countries dont last long

Lmfao

Laughs in American