Message from @Harrybaxter♫♫♩♫‿◦
Discord ID: 680869638707609627
there isnt another person in the scenario though
Well then
the continued original path would be taken
That doesnt make it correct
of course it doesnt
none of the choices are correct
but maybe some people cant make that kind of bloody choice
they're all bad
if none of the choices are correct then neither of them are incorrect
you can make a correct choice in a bad situation though
exactly
thus, i refuse
in terms of numbers you can be correct
no
your version of correct is purely based on numbers
yes.
no
you have no ability to quantify beyond the pure number of lives
which isnt a wrong figure to base it on
because in this scenario, its a large number of people, who are going to die, or 1 person who you could choose to die to save them
so you can only go on the number of people
because you have no other information
exactly
and i'm picking that this is an awful situation that i don't want to be part of
Some people cant make that fucking choice
is that hard to understand?
no its not hard to understand, but i wasnt saying that
i was just saying that "i dont agree with making choices"
is making a choice
in this scenario
yes, it's a choice, but it's a choice to not engage
It is a choice taken, that of inaction
it does not mean you think neither of them should be saved
if you could, im sure it would happen
if this case came up i'm sure in instinct i would save the most people
but rhetorically, no
it's not a choice
that i'm willing to buy into
but since one "party" will lose out either way, making no choice is also valid