Message from @Zaczac121

Discord ID: 681837226983686166


2020-02-25 12:12:38 UTC  

Where the British and Americans sent a squadron each to capture slaver ships and free black slaves

2020-02-25 12:13:31 UTC  

Already my favourite quote:

"We have no slaves at home – Then why abroad?
Slaves cannot breathe in England; if their lungs
Receive our air, that moment they are free.
They touch our country, and their shackles fall.
That's noble, and bespeaks a nation proud.
And jealous of the blessing. Spread it then,
And let it circulate through every vein."

2020-02-25 12:14:00 UTC  

Honestly when people bring up slavery just say " that happened ages ago and is no longer relevant" abd if they bring it up again just say "I don't care"

2020-02-25 12:14:10 UTC  

True

2020-02-25 12:14:14 UTC  

Since nowadays

2020-02-25 12:14:20 UTC  

Africa is already fucking bringing it back

2020-02-25 12:14:38 UTC  

Trading little girls in Nigeria

2020-02-25 12:14:44 UTC  

They dont really care about what happened or how we stopped it. So don't waste your breath

2020-02-25 12:14:49 UTC  

Do we have to go in and stop it again?

2020-02-25 12:14:54 UTC  

No

2020-02-25 12:15:23 UTC  

Maybe some of these countries were better administered under a British colonial governor

2020-02-25 12:15:26 UTC  

o.O

2020-02-25 12:15:42 UTC  

Just fucking delete them.

2020-02-25 12:15:47 UTC  

yes they were but they wanted independence so they can deal with it

2020-02-25 12:15:56 UTC  

Governing takes more resources than yeeting

2020-02-25 12:16:27 UTC  

Yeah the Empire abolished slavery and I'm proud of it for that but to say it wasnt racist is a bit silly

2020-02-25 12:16:52 UTC  

I didn't say it wasn't racist, theres always racism, but the government actively was against slavery

2020-02-25 12:17:06 UTC  

Thats pretty damn brave for a world of empires that do the exact opposite

2020-02-25 12:17:23 UTC  

Not really, it was beneficial for them in the long term

2020-02-25 12:17:29 UTC  

Even if the UK was the most powerful empire

2020-02-25 12:17:42 UTC  

Britain took the moral high ground

2020-02-25 12:17:57 UTC  

Britain always has the moral high ground

2020-02-25 12:18:04 UTC  

actively policed the slave trade and won

2020-02-25 12:18:39 UTC  

One British ship (Which was actually a captured Brazilian slave ship) captured more than 7 slave ships and freed hundreds of slaves

2020-02-25 12:19:10 UTC  

its not without stain though, the royal family financed "the african company"

2020-02-25 12:19:31 UTC  

the British empire banned slavery after trafficing almost three million people to the americas, and did so because slavery became unprofitable

2020-02-25 12:19:32 UTC  

Ofcourse, but theres always stains in imperial records

2020-02-25 12:19:57 UTC  

But the fact is that Britain banned it first and policed it

2020-02-25 12:20:03 UTC  

is very commendable

2020-02-25 12:20:17 UTC  

cant remember if it was george II or III

2020-02-25 12:20:22 UTC  

It could've just banned it and not policed it

2020-02-25 12:20:35 UTC  

But the fact Britain actively with the US blockaded Africa

2020-02-25 12:20:42 UTC  

but we must not kid ourselves that european empires stopped slavery because they suddenly realised how awfull it was

2020-02-25 12:20:45 UTC  

oh... Charles II ... completely wrong 😛

2020-02-25 12:21:00 UTC  

Actually

2020-02-25 12:21:11 UTC  

Anti-slavery movement in the UK came about during the Enlightenment

2020-02-25 12:21:32 UTC  

As more people in high places realised that that the practice was barbaric

2020-02-25 12:22:02 UTC  

There definitely was a moral component seperate from economic

2020-02-25 12:22:13 UTC  

that's when abolitionism became big, but there were always minorities against slavery, from the very beginning

2020-02-25 12:22:30 UTC  

Europeans always knew it was immoral, they just rationalised it

2020-02-25 12:22:41 UTC  

"The Committee for the Abolition of the Slave Trade was formed in 1787 by a group of Evangelical English Protestants allied with Quakers, to unite in their shared opposition to slavery and the slave trade. The Quakers had long viewed slavery as immoral, a blight upon humanity. By 1807 the abolitionist groups had a very sizable faction of like-minded members in the British Parliament. At their height they controlled 35–40 seats. Known as the "Saints", the alliance was led by the best known of the anti-slave trade campaigners, William Wilberforce, who had taken on the cause of abolition in 1787 after having read the evidence that Thomas Clarkson had amassed against the trade. These dedicated Parliamentarians had access to the legal draughtsmanship of James Stephen, Wilberforce's brother-in-law. They often saw their personal battle against slavery as a divinely ordained crusade. On Sunday, 28 October 1787, Wilberforce wrote in his diary: "God Almighty has set before me two great objects, the suppression of the slave trade and the reformation of manners."