@Jym,

I did not argue against that, however. In fact, I argued exactly what you've written, but there are those, such as Sq crcl, claiming an allied defensive use of force, whereupon taken in the course of time such an aggressor initiates against one, is an indistinguishable act of aggression, as though the defender is the initiator. To claim this, however, one must dispose of the NAP, itself, and likewise, the people of another geography beyond our borders, asking for our assistance, in the event they are unable to overthrow a government which has or is eliminating their liberties, would be an act of defense.

Governments do not have inherent sovereignty, individuals do, and for a State to possess sovereignty, it must be instituted with the explicit purpose of preserving the sovereignty and operate at the consent of those governed, liberty not present when one is not conjoined to the other, thus rendering the "State" and its organs as an illegitimate occupier of a territory within which it operates.

Lol, that whole Brazil situation

I mean, proly senators usually don't have heavy machinery LOIcenses

http://archive.is/LRgI6

http://archive.is/W3yvE

@Jeremy

Well there's a problem with that framework. If Israel violates the NAP of Palestinians or Iran violates the Iraqis or N Korea violates the rights of N Koreans it is immaterial to our national interests. They aren't Americans.

I'd also note that, by my definition, much of Europe, much of NATO, are not allies.

```Governments do not have inherent sovereignty, individuals do, and for a State to possess sovereignty, it must be instituted with the explicit purpose of preserving the sovereignty and operate at the consent of those governed, ```

that is a very specific view on sovereignty....

https://voiceofeurope.com/2020/02/netherlands-migrants-kick-elderly-dutchman-off-his-bicycle-film-it-and-laugh-hysterically/

http://archive.is/CZtmh

http://archive.is/fSFQi

Hollywood will now ‘spellcheck’ its scripts and advertising for lack of diversity https://www.rt.com/usa/481311-hollywood-geena-davis-spellcheck-bias/

Uhm.. the word isn't spellcheck, then. >.>

spellcheck?

The wrong think spell checker. "You misspelled this whole sentence!"

Womxn, Latinx nonsense as well.

so ... this seems to be a thing: https://old.reddit.com/r/Wuhan_Flu/comments/f6uy3g/who_stream_suddenly_cut_off_when_asked_about/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5p4Y4k5_Us

**RUSSIA!!!**

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-H0y7k4pK8q4/UgPrPJExQOI/AAAAAAAACH8/TjUihZekVpU/s1600/Putin+on+bear.png

B L Y A T. RASH BE

rush bernie

http://archive.is/uDua1 .

Oh, wow

http://archive.is/NtZG5

Oh, wow 3rd..

https://twitter.com/russian_market/status/1230504652283797511

Wait, the Iranian government does the same and hides the infected?

China 2.0 🦇

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKu1rl_cG28

tl:dr a little over $30,000

https://twitter.com/BNODesk/status/1230457718722441216?s=20

Where have I seen this before <:thunk:462282216467333140>..

🦇 http://archive.is/HtdK5

🎱

Hmmm

Didn't Sargon crowed funded his legal fees?