The key I think is that the system is optimized so that human failure is the *only* failure possible.

Not a rule. Something to aspire for, not to live by.

preferential treatment will be hard because it's private. but it will still happen. but hardly

I think we can much better reduce preferential treatment by reducing the incentive to do so.

Yeah but teachers need to be accountable, not over the rules. They can't only make up the rules if others are paying for it. <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>

Basically negating the incentive instead of using negative or positive reinforcement.

yes the school holds them accountable. the parents hold the school accountable

Probably ETBrooD both

Well I think schools aren't held accountable *because* they receive subsidization.

Reduce AND instate new ones

The free market holds people accountable naturally. They simply fail more often.

@Kingy200
There's no accountability towards the parents

Funny but the school has responsibility to the government first

taking in a private market. yes there is. The child is less likely to get a good education which means less pay. which means the parents don't got someone to look after them when their older

So u have to get rid of pensions

I'd rather have parents revise the teaching syllabus in its outlines

Because parents see what the current market values

Not choosing for the kids but for the syllabus

What % of tax did we get rid of btw

With the education system revision?

yes

Depending.
If you only take the monetary its maybe 3% in my guesstimate... Without looking anything up... Sowwy

what if you get rid of taxes aswell

i mean pensions

Sure and my issue is that no government will allow an independent control over money cows

I agree with you but don't see it without annexing gov first in its current manifestation

i agree. but my question still stand. i have a point with this

Ok
Hold on...

It could only be existing in a true freemarket.

Companies wouldn't care about certificates so much but merit only

the goverment doesn't give a fuuck about cert either tho. if they did they would have change the fact that lab rats aren't good rats to test on

this came out in the 90's and nothing has been done about it. It's all corrupt.

I respectfully disagree

They forcefully protect their monopoly over saying who can and can't qualify

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLb5hZLw44s&t=3426s

They are setting the ridiculous standards and operating principles

watch that. The standards they set dont work and kill people. Atleast in the free market you can blame the company. In this the goverment covers it up for allowing it to pass

A company has huge incentive to maintain a good public record

In this the goverment covers it up for allowing it to pass

Because when given a choice, people will spend their money somewhat wisely. Whereas if it's taken by force or coercion like taxes, then the "companies" (e.g. schools) can act with "morality" and government power on their side.

And anyone who doesn't understand that that inevitably leads to corruption is just a blue-eyed mofo.