<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

Methinks the lady doth protest too much <:smugon:512048583806025739>@excursion12 (redha, richtginger)

now you sound like an NPC

having sex with a child is wrong > child porn encourages the abuse of children for sexual recreation > images depicting children sexually will and does encourage people to seek out actual child porn

https://youtu.be/r3T8WbthnZ4

can you think for yourself?

can you defend yourself?

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) "MOHHHHHM! He didn't *agwee* w/ me, so I called him a stinky doo-doo head!" <:FuzzyPeach:583773935385182231>

harry the problem is you need evidence for that last statement

@Thundermark <:WaitWhatArmy:590858815189024778>

the fact that a lot of pedos also happen to seek out lolicon should be enough of a proof.

I’m watching a documentary on the suffragettes and Susan B Anthony looks like a fucking man

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) From what, a pathetic lower-life-form as you? You don't even *register* on my threat radar <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

no harry because that's not causation that's correlation

thunder you're the very embodiment of fuzzypeach rn

I'm agreeing with you on some things here

> having sex with a child is wrong > child porn encourages the abuse of children for sexual recreation > images depicting children sexually will and does encourage people to seek out actual child porn
killing people is wrong > violent media encourages killing for the sake of recreation > media depicting violent murder will and does encourage people to seek out actual footage of murders

child abuse is obviously bad but yo argument is shite

@Harrybaxter♫♫♩♫‿◦ "the fact that a lot of pedos also happen to seek out lolicon should be enough of a proof."

*"the fact that a lot of school shooters also happen to seek out violent vidya should be enough of a proof."*

but all you have to argue against me is projecting

pathetic really

**BRING ON THE MORAL PANIC!**

https://tenor.com/view/reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee-gif-15656567

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) no, you're just a retard trying to stir up a moral panic b/c you have no *actual* virtue in your life to be proud of <:slurpgon:583424900732157956>

<:WaitWhatArmy:590858815189024778>

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) *and* you can't string together a logical argument to save your life <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

the salt is real my guy

bruh that's a textbook non-sequitor @Thundermark

if you would think for a second you would realize we're in agreement here lol

I guess you can't think

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) Is Anita still hiring? You'd fit right in w/ her lot <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

you're an awful troll my guy

these "insults" don't even make sense

@Sectator Pragmaticam Lex No, he's a retard *and* his argument is bollox - those are two correlated, but technically independent things <:smugon:512048583806025739>

@Thundermark

@Thundermark

thunder I'm arguing against harry you actual loon

😂

***"LET'S LOCK UP ALL THE WHAMMYXN WHO FLICK THEIR BEAN TO RAVAGING FANTASIES, B/C THEY NORMALIZE RAAAAAAAEP!"*** <:peperage:588019564575457311>

wether he's a retard or not is irrelevant
if you go after the person instead of their point, you... don't do much to their point

sectator he's just trolling rn

pay no mind