@ubermensch you mean communist

and the thing is

things like social security

I believe nations exist

will probably die with our generation anyway

the population growth isnt good enough to maintain socialism

"Everything is changing. People are taking their comedians seriously and the politicians as a joke."

@Lucienne d'Anwyl Is anything tax-funded that benefits the people necessarily socialist?

cause

i dont think it is

sometimes you need the government to do shit

I mean if you can hold them to account then you should

on a federal level

if you cant

There was this essay written recently, forgot the title, which essentially suggested that the people in favour of socialism will always be a coalition of those who currently do not possess that which a group of people has

you know

definitely at least for social programs

because theyre ingerently wealth redistribution

and thus socialist

in principle

not all tax funded programs are wealth redistribution

but the ones that are are inherently socialist

Biological Leninism was the title of the essay

Healthcare isn’t really wealth redistribution unless they’re giving you money based on a disorder or some shit

@𒀭𒋾𒊩𒆳 ha

And socialism is for like

COMPLETE

wealth redistribution

No you fucking idiot, that's communism.

Nonono

Communism is the objective of socialism

according to the original text, at least

It's an interesting thought. That coalitions of minorities form to oppose a group they dislike

Eco-Marxism vs. Eco-fascism.

@Ares that's why nativism is the only rational policy.

tabuk iraqi dmr

I am most definitely not for gibs.

I agree. But you can't have that in a multiethnic nation

But I am for pensions. If you contribute to society you should get something out of it.