Message from @Samaritan™
Discord ID: 683516411049672946
yeah, i am of the opinion that inheritance shouldn't goto gov and STRICT limits should be placed on IP and total assets staying in your estates contril
cause it's the CHILDREN that inherit that money that do the MOST damange
You are not living to only feed the state yaknow. Kids deserve a leg up to the best of your effort.
People don't really get inheritance like they used to
People live much longer
if you get filthy rich cause of your own efforts? good for you. But that doesn't mean you get to give your kids enough so they never have to work their entire life
shouldn't matter not everyone lives longer.
cause you wouldnt' BE who you are without YOUR struggles
Yeah... it's a real shame soros fails to keel over for this long
so you can't prevent them from struggling after you are gone
if i had my way, you should be forced not to give the money up to gov, but instead leave it to community causes
charity
His day will come hopefully his kids will just blow his fortune on coke and exotic parties.
Why wouldn't they just transfer majority holdings over to their kids legally before dying
because that destroys capitalism
I'm not saying it'd go well for them, lol
You should choose though I would like to have the choice of what organization gets my money.
thse kids have a name: boursquise
Its bad for the health of capitalism but its in their interest to do, so I don't see why they wouldn't do it
the kids of rich elite ALREADY have a leg up on the rest; connections
Like if you went to a church for all your life you should let them have the money if you choose.
concentrating all the money at the top is detrimental to the system
Though that's working from the assumption that they aren't competent
competence is irrelevant
corruption, responsibility
nepotism within an organisation is one thing nepotism between organisations is another
you talking about children of the rich or corporations?
sorry, charaties
not corporations
nepotism is human nature
I'm saying that corporate family nepotism isn't as bad as inter corporate nepotism
nah, nepotism is present in 50% of humans
Nepotism is within your interest and means
eh I dunno about that
I feel like most people would give positons of power to their friends and family if they could
to say nepotism will result from ALL people is to make the same marxist error; that all people will act in accordance with the same input
Why wouldn't you give people who are your family or you position over strangers you do not know and cannot trust? after all that nepotism means more money for both involved
it only takes a few in control to corrupt an organization
Context if its in their interest not to be nepotistic they might not
Incentives is the word I'm looking for