Message from @Coolitic
Discord ID: 683534790246662189
that had nothing to do with "safety nets"
but you left when i made the associated argument regarding your inexperience with capitalism coolitc
we used to have this thing called 'savings'
I know
that maintained both liquidity and earned interest
this was our 'saftey net' too
now, you've gotten rid of that
so inevitably, where does that weight go?
welfare
the remainder of that net
and the left didn't cause the 2008 debacle
the right did
the "left" barely existed in 2008, congressionally-speaking
This is true you wouldn't need a safety net if you actually had savings, part of that is because some of the money I might save is being taxed into a black hole
it was only right afterwards that the Dems started veering off hard left
in your eyes maybe
because in my world, you are a bit liberal
š
...because I want to ban taxation?
no, that's not liberal
nope
ok, but that kind of liberal isn't left-wing
LOL
Ban taxation
because you don't beleive children need beatings
or was it 18th
I forget
they were basically a minarchist state
X
again, that's not understanding the differences between government and private sector
The problem with beating your kids is that it only works in conjunction with a certain type of culture
>Queen
>minarchy
children don't need beatings unless they do something insane
minarchy has to do with taxation and public services
Idk, it's okay to beat the kids based on context
The weakness culture of now actually does just generated fucked up people who were beat
nothing to do with monarchy or not
let me put it this way: how profitable would ANY company be if every 4 yrs a new ceo came in and spend all their time trying to undo the work of the last ceo?