Message from @halfthink

Discord ID: 653542110254989322


2019-10-11 01:00:47 UTC  

It's like pointing to black hair and saying it's a black person thing

2019-10-11 12:32:45 UTC  

It is. Niggers have black hair. It's a nigger thing. It's a rice nigger thing and curry nigger thing too. Niggers are niggers, nigger.

2019-10-11 13:22:34 UTC  

White people also have black hair and so do asians, indians and latinos just because something is over represented in one group doesn't mean there's a direct correlation

2019-10-11 22:38:11 UTC  

lol

2019-10-11 22:38:27 UTC  

@halfthink you type like a rapper

2019-10-11 22:39:35 UTC  

I don't think I've ever seen a light haired nigger.

2019-10-11 22:41:33 UTC  

It's not a white thing because whites can have lots of different colours.

2019-10-24 00:26:31 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/540584742798753794/636722152686485547/Department_of_Environment_deputy_secretary_says_whether_climate_change_is_bad_is_a_matter_of_opinion.mp4

2019-11-03 22:50:21 UTC  
2019-11-11 07:48:18 UTC  

Stonks.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/540584742798753794/643356317053878282/unknown-21.png

2019-11-20 07:02:45 UTC  

>>> In the spring of 1970, a new political term — "the hard hats" — burst upon the American consciousness. As the hard-hatted construction workers barreled their way around the Wall Street area, beating up college kids and peace demonstrators, earning the admiration of the right wing and a citation from President Nixon, one of the banners they raised summed up in a single phrase how remarkably the right wing has changed over the past two decades. For the banner said simply: "God Bless the Establishment."

In that single phrase, so typical of the current right wing, the hard-hats were expressing the age-old political philosophy of Conservatism, that philosophy which formed the central core of the originally labeled "Conservatism" of early 19th-century Europe. In fact, it is the philosophy that has marked genuinely conservative thought, regardless of label, since the ancient days of Oriental despotism: an all-encompassing reverence for "Throne-and-Altar," for whatever divinely sanctioned State apparatus happened to be in existence. In one form or another, "God Bless the Establishment" has always been the cry on behalf of State power.

-Murray N. Rothbard, The Betrayal of the American Right.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/540584742798753794/646606343066746902/images_-_2019-11-20T155207.675.jpeg

2019-12-05 01:17:36 UTC  

>>> If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.
-Charles Darwin, Origin of Species.

2019-12-05 04:07:55 UTC  

☝️ ☝️ ☝️ ☝️ ☝️ ☝️ ☝️ ☝️ ☝️ ☝️ ☝️ ☝️ ☝️ ☝️

2019-12-08 00:26:22 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/540584742798753794/653029569649049660/Jew_in_the_middle.webm

2019-12-09 10:23:01 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/540584742798753794/653542109558865920/me-explaining-to-my-friends-how-the-assassination-of-archduke-48107923.png

2019-12-09 10:23:03 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/540584742798753794/653542119482589206/image0-69-1.jpg

2019-12-09 10:23:12 UTC  

<:thinking_smudge:505870294229975043>

2019-12-09 10:23:25 UTC  

<:thinking:505872050225807390>

2019-12-16 05:16:32 UTC  
2019-12-16 11:59:30 UTC  

>>> Under post-Malthusian conditions the existence and the growth of the State produces a two-fold dysgenic effect, especially under democratic welfare-state conditions. For one, the “economically challenged,” as the principal “clients” of the welfare State, produce more surviving offspring, and the economically successful less. Second, the steady growth of a parasitic State, made possible by a growing underlying economy, systematically affects the requirements of economic success. Economic success becomes increasingly dependent on politics and political talent, i.e., the talent of using the State to enrich oneself at others’ expense. In any case, the population stock becomes increasingly worse (as far as the cognitive requirements of prosperity and economic growth are concerned), rather than better.
-Hans-Herman Hoppe, A Short History of Man: Progress and Decline.

2019-12-16 12:00:19 UTC  

>>> [T]he most natural and obvious check [on population] seemed to be to make every man provide for his own children; that this would operate in some respect as a measure and guide in the increase of population, as it might be expected that no man would bring beings into the world, for whom he could not find the means of support; that where this notwithstanding was the case, it seemed necessary, for the example of others, that the disgrace and inconvenience attending such a conduct should fall upon the individual, who had thus inconsiderately plunged himself and innocent children in misery and want.—The institution of marriage, or at least, of some express or implied obligation on every man to support his own children, seems to be the natural result of these reasonings in a community under the difficulties that we have supposed.
-Thomas Malthus, Essay on the Principle of Population.

2019-12-16 14:45:55 UTC  
2019-12-22 22:38:53 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/540584742798753794/658438338419621892/image0-152.jpg

2019-12-22 22:39:38 UTC  

amazing

2019-12-22 23:30:20 UTC  

Historians: *"hey ive seen this one"*
SJWs *"WhAt ArE yOu SaYiNg ItS bRaNd NeW"*

2020-02-11 11:43:52 UTC  

Abiogenesis and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/540584742798753794/676755281971249184/Screenshot_2020-02-11-21-08-09.png

2020-03-01 02:18:14 UTC  

dawkins and the rest of the neodarwinians = 🤡