Message from @Nogori
Discord ID: 668872327429095427
> lady is proven to make false rape claim in cyprus
> british leftists rather than accept the fact sperg out and then proceed to unconditionally believe the false accuser regardless of evidence
anyone that tells me secular humanism isnt a cult or religion is just as much of a liar as the accuser to begin with
As is tradition.
Traditions afaik are morally/ethically permissible when adherence is voluntary and the subject matter of said tradition doesn't devalue life in any way (such as hazing/ritual sacrifice/playing the victim card for clout points at the cost of someone elses honor and dignity etc), however otherwise yes it wouldn't be unlike a cult to force people to do anything on its behalf really
Debate on title topic starts about 25min in.
jreg hits another home run against those that destroyed general salamander
> If we know what the Old Right was against, what were they for? In general terms, they were for a restoration of the liberty of the old republic, of a government strictly limited to the defense of the rights of private property. In the concrete, as in the case of any broad coalition, there were differences of opinion within this overall framework. But we can boil down those differences to this question: How much of existing government would you repeal? How far would you roll government back?
> The minimum demand that almost all Old Rightists agreed on, which virtually defined the Old Right, was total abolition of the New Deal, the whole kit and caboodle of the welfare state, the Wagner Act, the Social Security Act, going off gold in 1933, and all the rest. Beyond that, there were charming disagreements. Some would stop at repealing the New Deal. Others would press on, to abolition of Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom, including the Federal Reserve System and especially that mighty instrument of tyranny, the income tax and the Internal Revenue Service. Still others, extremists such as myself, would not stop until we repealed the Federal Judiciary Act of 1789, and maybe even think the unthinkable and restore the good old Articles of Confederation.
> -Murray N. Rothbard, A Strategy for the Right.
https://mises.org/library/strategy-right
https://youtu.be/CneNumSHAh0
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/589257101830914048/665460971304910848/ezgif-7-f3895d8e53f1.gif
What about the means of reproduction though?
Only statists breed, comrade.
wait what about anprims? theres gotta be an accidental pregnancy out there somewhere
All sex is rape, statist.
what if the sex is voluntary on part of both (or more lol) parties involved?
*Frankly the concern is that based on your presupposition of newer = better, than you either struggle with dedication to your position as manager (and may either nag for promotions or raises mercillessly as a result) or that you are not responsible for the long term upkeep of newly acquired goods. To be even more frank, the fact that you judge people based on their physical appearance rather than the content of their character and the upkeep of said older, more antiquated goods and services, has confirmed that you are indeed a materialistic, insecure, self centered, manipulative narcissist that could not, and would not be bothered care about their workers; unless you were placed in a setting of which would associate you WITH your workers, hence the acts of micromanagement*
rule britannia
Just watch this it contains many factuals
Now im still for small government but the moment any secular government becomes ungovernwble wnd indirectly accountabke through the supposed "fairness" of democracy its too freaking big
Now you could say the same thing about God but the difference between Him and secular tyrants are that the tyrants of both the left and rignt tax you for the crime of existing, while God only took hunanity out of a perfect circumetance to teach Adam, Eve, and everyone thereafter why relations and sociability between people, families friends etc is important.
Additionally, he also did this to teach us how hedonism and self indulgence wll but gets in the way of the aims of both healthy individuals and collectives, regard less of religion, race, colour and creed.
Out of which comes the fine line that seperates, yet complimentarily emphasises both liberty and morals (through self evident empirical, existential, experiential, and experimental truths) is drawn...
Tap to see the meme - https://ifunny.co/fun/xATVkkyK7?s=u
> Economist Mark Blaug has criticized over-reliance on methodological individualism in economics, saying that "it is helpful to note what methodological individualism strictly interpreted [...] would imply for economics. In effect, it would rule out all macroeconomic propositions that cannot be reduced to microeconomic ones [...] this amounts to saying goodbye to almost the whole of received macroeconomics. There must be something wrong with a methodological principle that has such devastating implications".[3]
https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1467399434338s.jpg
universal/free healthcare is a spook
1. its not universal
2. its not free
3. if the lines are long, its not even fucking healthcare
and people pay for that?
*hurr durr are policies act in everyones best interests so well that no one criticises it (out of fear of being locked up of course)*
hope those sellout politician fucks like the taste of lead when the time comes
(not even speaking on my own behalf either lol)
Victim culture hits the courts: Woman gets paid for career she MIGHT have had but gave up for marriage and kids https://www.rt.com/op-ed/482025-divorce-london-settlement-career/