You see this is why we need a small govt that we can manage albeit one thats productive, otherwise we either get george orwells wet dream or pointless arguments as to whether a piece of paper defines us or not (and while in moral principle it shouldnt,practically speaking its significant in regards to basically everything libertarians would consider holy as it provides sound definitions of the rights freedoms and principles we currently advocate for) ...
The constitution irregardless of semantics was intended as a small govt arrangement, and while it defines legal matters on a collective basis, a good thing about it its not so overbearing of a basis that our sesame credit gets ruined everytime we jerk off, and not so underbearing of a basis that no one is held accountable irregardless of religious or political belief, which inevitably results in yugoslavisation and microcollectivisation of said group and then middle age feudalism 2.0 electric boogaloo happens...
Besides, the constitution not only was a far lesser evil than the alternative (rothschild fiat currency enforced debt slavery by order of the king of england unto the colonies) but (again, assuming theres nothing about it that puts anyone above another on the basis of identity)
If the constitutional definition of slavery is being able to defend your own property without necissitating outside help, freedom to practice religion, freedom of speech, freedom of association, and private property rights, then sign me the fuck up because society went wrong the moment we started pandering to anyone who would even fancy the concept of, and concepts that support big government + the unholy principalities, powers, forces and tyranny it enables in the long term...
