but if any of you want to vc just @ me

@Deleted User proof

Hello

Welcome to the Archive!

Grab a cup of koffee and a PDF

@everyone Hitler invaded France. I need provement it was non violent

France declared war.

Also, the invazion was very quick

it was violent ofcorse it was war!

It was an invasion but a quick one

There was no torture, mass killings or whatever if that's what you're asking

Germans had great reputation in the civilian population and a lot of French girls fell in love with German soldiers

I need provement

Shouldent the burden of proof rely on the person challenging it?

Maybe. I gør a little angry when he said cumunism and ns was the same thing

Afaik they executed ethnic germans fighting for france

Okay

@Deleted User the proper term is "I need proof", not "I need provement" 😉

whan an idiot

The grammar nazi?

@Deleted User

@Deleted User

How fast do you mine?

@Deleted User Grammar National Socialist*

Jeez don't be rude

Ok I'm gonna stop before someone actually gets angry

It's good I get corrected

Thunder, please give yourself a nickname...

@Hildegard Got anything about the Nazi German economy? So far have only seen heavy criticism

Yes i think we do

Let me find it for ya

@Deleted User NATSOC ECONOMICS EXPLAINED
------ @everyone
>One of the most plagued questions we get when talking about Fascism is economics, normally brought up by people still stuck in a liberal mentality and limited scope of perception, where everything is defined in term of social and economic policies, rather than principles derived from the notion of a singular Truth and Order that dominates the world. The variety of historic economic plans and practices maintained by various champions of our Struggle likewise distorts any comprehensive answer to the question. All in all we've simply answered people that economics are secondary, they don't matter in such a way as to be a fundamental and defining element of Fascism. The answer didn't change, however there is now a way in which we can describe this attitude to economics, and it's actually a word we've used repeatedly in reference to Fascism anyway: Socialism.

>Our Socialism, however, is not in of itself an economic system, it is not the Socialism of Marx and co and stands in direct opposition to both Communism and Capitalism. It would be more accurate to say that to Fascism, Socialism is the definitive social structure which is more comparable to the structures of Individualism and Collectivism, yet it stands in opposition to those two structures as well.

(Continued)
http://archive.is/7CUMq

For more, see pastebin:
http://pastebin.com/PPsmxdiK

good stuff