@Avilio Have you read it?

no, i had a guy tell me about it though

Well read it

At least the chapter on Demanders

Page 12

i try to go by the words of "If not you, then who? If not now, then when?"

TRY

what

not good at it though

nvm I get it

Good words

@Deleted User What kinda book is that?

Path of Gods

Fascist Handbook

For the 21st Century

It's really good

its an explanation of fascism for a modern day individual

and the tennants of it i guess

ill try to remember to read it

Doesn't go very deep into the explanation of Fascism but as the name should tell you it is a handbook. How to act, what to do and who to support

@Deleted User. Who wrote that handbook?

@Deleted User Hello. I have read one of your pamflets about homosexuality particulary this one: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/356134230474096640/463060693659287572/01_-_UpmrFYM.jpg . It is mostly correct but at the eight point it talks about interracial marriage and it says that it is a good thing.

I just had to point this out because in a way it's not matching with the worldview of this server.

@Яvenge henlo

I'm here for the win!

@Deleted User is that from the Family Research Institute?

They're not a white Nationalist Group

They're just a bunch of Christian fundalmentalists

@Deleted User. Did you write that pamphlet?

On 1c, marriage to animals should be added. How can we deny human rights to all humanoids? Koko the Gorilla can use sign language, therefore she could consent to a marriage.

On #2, I would have attacked the meaning of the word discrimination, because having good discrimination used to be considered a noble virtue. Now it is considered immoral, yet people dont have another word to replace positive discrimination.

No I didn't write it

It was probably written by a christian fundalmentalists

Oh that explains it. There are some arguments that are just a little off.

@Manstein Idk for sure but it is a Wewelsburg Archives publication

Most likely from some Ironmarch guy

Well, it already starts rather awkward.

1a and 4c, for example.

11a conflicts with the idea of 9a.

Marriage is state-sanctioned for social benefits, but somehow it's fair to deny that to certain citizens, it doesn't sound compatible.