Well it mentions both Europe and America in the file anyway. Totalitarianism will rise in Europe and Anarchy in America before the Organic State. So yes, it will be different obviously but yeah I’d say

In Europe the race war will be easier

I better go. Nice chat. Hey lemayo, if you agree with my definition of fascism, will you tell @Defense. to eat a dick?

Hahahha

Cya mate

Cya bro

yeah bye

what you said is only a part of the definition

if only i remember what you said correctly

why delet

ååååååååååååå

°Fascism: A worldview in which the Fascist believes that Nature/God established universal laws, and these should be discovered, implemented, and adhered to.

His definition

It’s good

This is a bit more sophisticated.

but the universal laws are a part of the truth

RAPE YOUR MAILAN

People will inevitably take different paths to reach the same or similar goals.

It is like a fingerprint or our DNA, it's the little individual differences that make people people.

You may use a small blowtorch to melt iron, but you might not be able to use it to melt tungsten. However, the end goal would be to melt both, for which you use different temperatures and, consequently, different ways.

People can call themselves whatever they want, anyway. The actions will be what defines their true alignment.

@Sterling. People can call themselves Poop Dick, that doesn't make PoopDickism a worldview of truth.

Depending on what they stand for, it actually could be.

https://pastebin.com/ku21KkQP

Dafaq was this convo

I liked it

Dont advert without asking the owner please

@Deleted User

@Sterling. The language we use to communicate with eachother must be preserved. We cannot allow a rebel or a provacateur to manipulate our language. The words we use to describe our worldview must be accurate, or else those words could sow division within the broader fascist movement.

Indeed, consistency and standardizing helps a lot in having an actual idea of what is what and what isn't what.

Although the core idea is "just because you call yourself X, it doesn't mean you're X", like those kids that call themselves Communists while not even comprehending the idea behind it.

So they in turn think Communism is simply being against Capitalism and proudly wave a flag which meaning they don't know.

Similarly, it can be applied to some people that go around talking about how NatSoc™ they are, while they simply hate Jews and nothing else.

Although that ends up falling in the consistency and standardizing of the idea too, anyway.

Your last post seems to support my argument more so than your previous post.

I think a good example would be a sports match between two opposing teams. Everyone on a team wears the same jersey as the rest of the team. If one of your players decides to wear the jersey of the opponent, yet still play ball for his actual team, then that one rebel player will cause the other players to stumble, and maybe forfeit the game.

Can I get the invite to this server?

I'm not necessarily saying that people should abandon their appearance and turn everything into a shitstorm, just people do call themselves the wrong thing on various occasions and then their actions step in to decide what they stand for, specially with the way people label themselves semi-randomly. What some people saw as an application of Mosley's Fascism, I used to call ethical Capitalism, and then a somewhat undecided Libertarian Right, due to its nature of appearing oppressive and censoring on some aspects, yet fluffy and cute on others. In the end, the closest existing thing to what I believe in so far was Integralism. Out of ignorance, I used to label myself things that weren't actually describing my view.

So here I am, believing in a thing with a probably way too long name.