What is the minimal amount of data required to decide if something is statistically correlated or not

I'm down to write some fucking code

Hi down to write some fucking code, I'm ∞!

Cause the distribution can change organically.

Well I guess its gonna depend what is enough to buffer, maybe it can be up to a week of data max.

Timeline is not really the problem, it's the ability to gather the data and parse it so it makes sense ot whatever system of functions you want to use on it

Holy fuck thats gonna run slow.

Yeah, i understand the datacenter need.

Q wouldn't tell us if we didn't have a snowballs chance in hell of figuring it out.

We're not retarded

Bottleneck is always bandwidth of the data to cpu's.

dude that's not a real problem

We don't need all the data

We just need the right data

Well you gotta house the data somewhere, either on RAM or HDD.

So ramdisk it then?

If you worry about the right data I'll worry about the muh memory shit

fair enough.

It's largely a solved problem for toy examples like we're doing.

And we just need the right data

So, we need a what, and filter the nots.

Just parse filters that exist like bing's search by time shit

Another option is to parse twitter of all the sites interested since they typically whore out all their new material as it comes out.

I think it relates to if the vote counts in relation to senate races fall out of the normal tiers

Whats the final answer this needs to look for?

The probability of outcome by influence?

The probability of something happening at a certain time in a certain place.

Or two something happenings and two certain places if they're correlated or not

I'm in.

Hi in., I'm ∞!

Where do I sign up.

Im single now, and nothing left to lose.

I dont even know how to begin to express the problem.

Eh you're better off.

Well humans are intuitive creatures, and the predictability matrix of humans acrossed all platforms combined, can potentially predict future outcomes.

Oh I'm sure they can do it.

Question would be if they do predict it in unison.

You're thinking too complicated like.

It has to be something like, Q posts, next day an uptick in mockingbird output about things relevant to Qposts

Then there's like 10 outlets doing the same thing, impling there is some correlation