Message from jman in Turtle Hermit School #q-general

2018-10-05 21:10:52 UTC

2018-10-05 22:02:15 UTC  

Note the doubke eagle on the Russian sub symbol

2018-10-05 22:16:04 UTC  

The "hunt for" was dropped because they knew where the sub was. They used the hacked chips to find out where it was. They baited them to fire the missile. They fired, they committed. Trump was never in danger to begin with. I dunno just my shitty two cents.

2018-10-05 22:33:10 UTC

2018-10-05 22:41:04 UTC  

posted 43 minutes ago

2018-10-05 23:20:13 UTC  
2018-10-05 23:24:42 UTC  

So what? Now Russia is the bad guys again?

2018-10-05 23:25:14 UTC  

I think it's more about who controlled which of their subs

2018-10-05 23:25:51 UTC  

Read my comment above

2018-10-05 23:26:40 UTC  

didnt know how to tie my thoughts to yours without writing a novel, but I think we're on as near to the same page as Q cryptography permits

2018-10-05 23:29:17 UTC  

aged poorly, but you get the idea. could it be that this is the weapon they meant to use to trigger WW?

2018-10-05 23:29:41 UTC  

@Mr. Sofaking Fluffykins so your thought is the Russians fire the missle or the fveyes hacked the sub and launched?

2018-10-05 23:29:42 UTC  

Congratulations @BreadTwists, you're now level 4.

2018-10-05 23:31:30 UTC  

Also, I think we're overlooking that all this fuckery must have been facilitated by China, or rogue China.

2018-10-05 23:32:22 UTC  

RED China, just sayin

2018-10-05 23:32:45 UTC  

I'm just getting off work and am lost at the moment

2018-10-05 23:35:08 UTC  

a lot of what im saying comes from decodes from back in june when the missile Q referenced today was fired, and following days. Posts were about china having hacked a contractor tied all up with DARPA and some secret USNavy sub project.

2018-10-06 00:22:25 UTC  

Ah yes I recall. I wasn't seeing how or why Russia had anything to do with that

2018-10-06 00:29:37 UTC  

I don't think it does, necessarily, or directly. I think the over-arching theme is that the plan was to blame russia for something the Cabal was doing. Seems to me likely they'd have at least one unit from each side, in order to "start a war", or at the least that what we think they did with a US Sub in the puget sound, they would have tried to do with other nations' naval forces

2018-10-06 00:32:10 UTC  

Yeah that's where I'm at

2018-10-06 00:32:19 UTC  


2018-10-06 00:33:46 UTC  

In the actual movie "The Hunt for Red October" if the russian submarine was being used to deliver a nuclear payload rather than trying to defect (as were the competing theories), might not it have started a war? Maybe the film was to prime reactions to what they actually intended to do someday, in mimicking the plot, but, when we give them ground,. they deliver the opposite outcome. The film would prime someone not to listen to putin telling them the sub was rogue and hostile.

2018-10-06 00:34:48 UTC  

far flung, but its what got me on the thought train

2018-10-06 00:34:48 UTC  

Congratulations @jman, you're now level 6.

2018-10-06 00:35:24 UTC  

I love thoughts

2018-10-06 00:44:05 UTC  

2018-10-06 01:30:51 UTC  

we were saying

2018-10-06 01:35:42 UTC  

@BreadTwists please feel free to post music links in other chat channels. <#489836618207985670> is for Q related discussion. Thanks 😊

2018-10-06 01:36:15 UTC  

Yeah that was an accident

2018-10-06 01:36:25 UTC  

Also you do not have DJ role so the bot will not play for you

2018-10-06 01:36:37 UTC  

No problem

2018-10-06 02:00:08 UTC  

Trump said something in that press conference last week about China interfering in the midterm elections, and the jackals hounded him about what proof we had... He said something like, you'll all know soon, 'I mean, its not just based on nothing.'

2018-10-06 02:02:48 UTC