Message from @Kowloon
Discord ID: 554486999504125962
you're wrong
I’m going to read it now that I don’t have to give them money for it, but I am interested to hear informed opinions from people who have already done so. @ᶜʳᶦᵗᵗᶻ
this my opinion
MENSA member, are you?
yeah
are we part of the same psuedo-intellectual org?
You looked that up fairly quickly. Good job
Lol
me
what does this have to do with Q?
me
fuckoff then
@Kowloon this channel is for Q related discussion. We have other channels for shitposting
Basically, any other channel...
cancerward
@ᶜʳᶦᵗᵗᶻ so in your opinion was the book a net positive or negative for the movement ?
No
overall a neg, for the reasons originally stated - stating that they are authorities on Q , acting as a representatives for the whole community and monetising Q , if the book stayed true to just Q released info then I would say a positive - overall its just namefags getting more fame and $ (ill leave JOE M out of that) - SB2 had the best input from what I read .
🤔
discuss
fuckoff to <#489837874393645066>
poop
crying
shitting up Q resarch
what is q
lmao
i was trying to debate about gaddafi's greenbook
i bet ur nose built like a tv remote
<:gay:498623974029131788>
I would agree, without having read it yet, admittedly. That’s basically how I feel about it too. I’m concerned about the impression it gives to newbies just learning about Q
day of the rope is soon shills
are rainbows naturally gay
no
Yes
but chemically
the trails make people think