women didn't evolve the woman+infant pair evolved

What do you mean

I mean a lot of traits that women have aren't necessarily for their sake

A woman is not a woman without a child?

they are for the sake of the protection of themselves and an infant

because it takes so long for children to become adults

It seems to me that a father has just as much a duty to protect and commune with their infants though.

yes but men have other duties as well

For survival.

So does the woman though.

I'mve talking about the average scenario

I'm not sure how to determine an average scenario

and the average traits

women are on average more neurotic

more agreeable

more interested in people

and that's for children's sake

So why do u introduce evolutionary needs into a situation you seem to claim is static?

Aka, were "women" always like this?

And are females always like this in the animal kingdom?

it depends on how long childhood is

independent of lifespan?

I don't know

I assume it isn't

it's not like the lifespan of an animal is gonna influence it's sense of time

Why wouldnt its lifespan somehow biologically influence its sense of time? There might be some factor at play. Idk.

@Forest For weed

Idk animals are weird

The only thing I tested as definitely female was Neuroticism

Imagine that

Oh, and intellect.

Everything else I'm a dude i guess.

Amy has higher t than me

I took one before and got something like 40% concientiousness 95% openess 95% emotional stability 60% agreeableness 65% extraversion

This one doesnt have emotional stability.

that's neuroticism

so I would be 5% for neuroticism

Interesting

Maybe women are only annoying because men dont provide for them.

it's constant so-called shit tests

wow trump and macron actually come off as genuine buddies