Message from @WhiteTrashWorkhorse
Discord ID: 463418747021950976
yeah they seem like some pretty standard headphones
7.1 on headphones is a MEME though
Why?
because your headphones dont have 7 seperate speakers in them
Lol
i had a pair once
you flick the switch and it just increases the low end frequencies
to fool you into some sort of "fuller" sound
Like my "noise cancelling" headphones that I bought that just boost it slightly louder
Things suck
real noise cancelling cost like £150 plus
Yeah
Might buy some decent headphones with my tax refund
Recommend me some in that I can carry around, man
brb food
In summary, we could say that Humanae vitae formulates the conditions according to which a sexual act is an adequate expression of conjugal love. Only when it remains in itself open to the transmission of life is the sexual act between spouses an act of union between the two, in which the authentic gift of self is realized in the body. The link between the two meanings should not be located at the biological level, but rather at the intentional level: there can be an intentionally contraceptive act which, even if it is physiologically fruitful, contradicts the truth of self-giving (for example, an act in which artificial contraception fails); just as there can be an act that per se is open to life, even though it is physiologically sterile and known as such (as happens in the natural regulation of births).
An act rendered intentionally sterile denies at the same time the sincere openness to the gift of oneself and the full acceptance of the other: it is an act that turns in on itself. Although carried out with the consent and collaboration of one’s partner, the contraceptive act intentionally closed to procreation is an act aimed at the pursuit of individual pleasure, which does not differ from masturbation. For this reason, sexual difference does not play a qualifying role in such an act and it is therefore analogous to homosexual acts. The English philosopher G.E.M. Anscombe says that those in favor of contraception will have no arguments to oppose homosexual relationships. The Italian philosopher Augusto Del Noce went so far as to say that “today’s nihilism (which he calls gay nihilism) always intends love ‘homosexually’ even when upholding a man-woman relationship.” It has been rightly observed that the man-woman relationship was public from its origin with its openness to the generation of children, and that is why it is sanctioned by marriage, while the homosexual relationship is in se private and cannot be recognized as marriage.
get a load of that snoz
@Le Meme man lol
Downloaded
What the hell
Everyone was high on nitro or something
this is not what urban dictionary is for guys