Occam's razor

It's not crap, watch JBP's lectures before you say such nonsense.

Hitches like myself will never believe in God because there are no valid arguments for the existence of God

Not only does JBP consider the Bible an impressive corpus of texts transferring surprisingly insightful wisdom through generations, during the Q&A sessions there are plenty of atheists voicing their surprise, because they thought exactly like you before.

Honestly right, give me one reason why your religion is more valid than pastafarianism.

Harry Pottter contains the secrets of the universe because of how I intepret it

Yes weak minded people of all walks of life can be enticed by smart sounding people talking with big words, that is still not an argument

Whatever makes you think you have moral and intellectual superiority, dude.

Page 3 of my gay furry smut collection contains esoteric divine knowledge only the enlightened few can parse, prove me wrong :^)

Who mentioned morals lol

lol

The whole argument of Hitchens was that god wasn't good enough for him.

Which is from where he derives the idea that therefore god can't exist.

Honestly do you think a jbp psychoanalysis of the instruction manual for an electric drill will contain any more factual knowledge than of the Bible?

Why do you bring up hitchens and why do you misrepresent his argument so badly?

Because his statements about the Bible are factually wrong.

It seems to me like youre used to trying to defend your bronze age mythology, do you religionfag often?

@DanielKO sounds like a former atheifag who's been enlightened by the prophet JBP

may kermit bless his name

I just point out when atheist fags try to virtue signal their unbelief as being some sort of intellectual ivory tower.

Lmao

"I'm an atheist because my intellect and because of this misrepresentation of the Bible."

There is no reason-based argument for believing in God. If you cannot demonstrate this statement to be false, nothing you say beyond this will matter

At least make an effort to analyse the Bible fairly, otherwise you'll just come out as being dishonest.

Notice how I never said you should believe in god.

Why does the Bible state that pi = 3

1 Kings 7:23

It doesn't.

Also, that has no theological or moral implications.

And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: it was round all about, and his height was five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about

It's irrefutable factual inaccuracy in the bible

Not to mention all of Genesis is obvious bullshit, I seriously hope I don't need to explain why to you

And the "he" in there was a fucking artisan.

You could probably benefit from having the Genesis explained to you though, JBP just finished Genesis.

>Hiram was the Phoenician artisan recorded as having been hired by King Solomon to design and supervise the building of the Jewish temple.

Does it contain any *information* though

One thing that atheists like to do is collect "problematic" quotes from the Bible, without ever bothering to check the context, or check to see if the argument has been debunked.

I've seen people taking Jesus out of context, to attribute a character from a parable to his own words, to say he defends slavery.

And then a dozen other atheists just nod their heads and agree. "Seriously guys, nobody double checked that claim?"

Do you believe the Bible provides a valid moral compass?

I do believe it does provide various moral lessons, yes, like many other fairy tales and mythological tales.