there is no scientific consensus on it

you can call it urine? yes

but, other person can also call it "not urine'

both would be right in the end

"Traps aren't gay."

and that's fine

Just call it

Golden Shower

I don't think the metaphor is getting across.

nah

not squirting

because is is mostly being peed on

sorry if i understand " there is no scientific consensus"

thot

>No scientific consensus on this substance coming out of a women's urethra so i must not be getting pissed all over

yeah, that's the only thing that's on the article

That was basically the metaphor, sort of.

yeah, i know

but it's stupid

Not entirely, no.

people that know much more than us about the subject don't agree on it because of conflicting evidence

as i said

you can call it pee and be right, another person can call it not pee and also be right

and they are still getting pissed on

Let's just say, paying 7 hookers to "ejaculate" in a lab isn't very conclusive research.

I don't know about you, but I would not be down to go and wank it with hot jelly on my pelvis and a large ultrasound stick squished into my pelvis.

With someone else just sitting there.

Let me apply for a NSF grant.

The fact people did that is weird enough as it is.

@DanielKO
There is a part of the article that said that's one of the problems.

Still there is conflicting evidence on it

@Maw
There is worse stuff tbh

We could crowd source it. The experiments will be live streamed, for transparency purposes, on pornhub.

honestly?

it would work

not only this

but other sex related studies too

Does pornhub have streaming service?

if don't, they can create one

I dont know. porn is degenerate

here we go again

Why is a discussion on the chemical properties of cum in the politics channel?