Message from @Maw
Discord ID: 463578568987901953
I'm again, not going to kill people for making dumb choices.
Now if they murder someone, different story.
You could put up the sign put up a layer out mines with baby powder then the mines after.
If your going that route
I would rather not?
Breaking the law of a foreign nation and disregarding their border is not a 'dumb mistake'. It's a calulated decision.
It is not worth capital punishment/war-level violence.
No matter how much you claim it is.
then build a wall
That's the idea.
For me it is. Why else do we have a nation if not to defend its borders?
A very regressive stance, in my opinion.
If you can define regressive/progressive, I may concede
Defend the borders, yes, kill people crossing the border, no.
One of these is no longer societially acceptable, where it may have been decades ago.
Which is regressive.
why not encourage them to stop coming?
So?
by shooting the fuckers who try to border hop
First before we start on the wall I want something done about the sanctuary cities and states
It should be used as a last resort.
like what?
"Cross this line, or else I shoot."
Simple enough instructions.
they might piss on your words, but they know well enough not to fuck with guys with guns
Which is exactly why arresting and deporting is effective.
Because the border patrol is armed.
@OtaRev for cities, just cutoff their funding entirely
for states, threaten to revoke statehood
and if they still keep border hopping?
when then?
Make it difficult enough to not be worth the risk.
like armed guards, waiting to shoot border hoppers....
The risk is being shot
The reason they cross is because it's easy to cross right now.
There is little risk.
I don't think California would take revoking statehood as a threat.
Not much likelyhood to be caught.
have an actual minefield, and they'll stop dead in their tracks
Have a wall, and the same thing is proven to happen.
And the wall is less expensive.
And results in less death.