lol
You could use that argument with literally anything
My boys arnt old enough for it to matter yet
"What if they sell the prize to a random person?"
XD
That's not the fault of the company.
It just seems like more stupid laws.
And agreed @Maw
If anything they are good
because it allows companies to market in gambling free areas
What does that even mean?
most states are anti gambling
It sounds like a whole lot of nothing.
If lottories were deamed gambling none of those games would be allowed
Lotteries are not an argument
And the rather profitable for schools state lottos would be shut down
That is moneyfor money
directly
This came up many times before, and it was ruled that it's not considered gambling as long as the company doesn't actually give monetary value to anything.
This came up in the *60s*
Lottery can be money for money, or money for items
Not to be classified under gambling laws 18+ so on and so on
So, it is different
Loot crates are technically a lottery
Technically, or legally?
The original precedent for this is about baseball card booster packs.
Good example, card games
both
And it was ruled the companies aren't liable.
Now that is a lottery
Hey, let's ban those.
While were at it sometimes you get differing quality of food items, sounds like gambling
Ban it too
fuck it BAN EVERYTHING
I never said I was pro banning it
I was just seeing a slippery slope is all. heheh
Also, I enjoy theatrics a bit.
Fair, but it is a slope im against
Im actually pro gambling tbh
