well......depends on your definition

a group of individuals, governed by personal greed

thats vague as fuck

that's what a corporation is

That's largely what capitalism is.

is a family looking for food in a river a corporation?

The ability to benefit yourself at the cost of other people.

that little family doesn't matter to 5 powerhouses

Which, I think personally is the superior system, as long as it has regulations.

so why should it to me?

no entity in the cpaitalist system can do that without violating the NAP

I'd be ancap too, but I enjoy reality

because a trade is positive sum

doesn't work in the end

at all

it's too fucking naive

Same problem with communism in that regard.

I'd love to be a communist too

Or socialism/marxism.

but hey, doesn't work

@Mips arent a lot of ideals just that? Ideals.

Which would you be better off moving towards?

@Jaz (Raisu) well they are, but if people are gonna fight and argue for something, could be good if it was applicable

the freedom index shows that as countries move towards ancapism it becomes more proserous

*they

Well yes, the more libertarian somewhere is, the more anarchist it is.

That's... pretty basic.

I mean yeah, killing off africa in favour for sunny vacation spots sounds good too

and the better developed and prosperous it is

that was the point

I mean, capitalism was applicable in the past, but then corporations and government backed bullshit happened

and corporations will continue to do so

until stopped dead in their tracks

not if they dont get govt subsidies

and to think they'd stop because you ask them nicely won't ever happen

Now, yes, I agree, capitalism causes more growth. No argument there, but to say because of that, that the extreme version of capitalism would work is a bit... wonky in terms of logic.

Because trade is positive sum

^

money still has to be made in this utopia

and to do so

someone has to supply jobs