To me it would seem logical that if you were violated like that, it might have a traumatic effect on you and you’d keep silent for a while

we haven't gotten any credible proof that she *was violated*

But 30+ years seems excessive

other than her muddy words

And all she has to back up her claims are her memory

Why is 30 years to long to keep this?

Which is at times inconsistent and she forgets stuff

She’s had therapy for years she said

She seems to know all the important parts. Try and think of a memory you have yourself./

how can you remember a event with complete clarity that happened so long along?

Even confided shit to her therapist

was there ever a reason given as to why she wanted the accusations to stay confidential before the "leaks"?
like, what was the point of her talking to feinstein if they didn't plan on doing something with the information?

you may **Think** that you remembered it, but it could be your brain filling in the details

It’s just vague enough to be believable yet unprovable except by anecdotal evidence

She was at a party

Like I know of a time where some kid in my class was robbed by another kid, and I know the details of the event really well, but the class trip was a fuzz otherwise.

You can't for sure remember

Who’s to say she wasn’t drunk and imagined it all?

She said herself she was drinking

but believe wahmen

I think she said she was sober. I think we'll need to go over the testimony again.

I recall her saying

She didn’t want to come out with the story to her parents because she’d have to explain she was at a party, drinking

At the time

@Deleted User which would weaken her position

I don't remember that, but it's too early in the morning for me to scan the hours of tapes again.

Why is Kavanauv's testimony more credible than her's?

I’m not saying it is

But her testimony seems incredibly sketchy

Well he's totally suspicious about his "calendars"

Kavanaugh has calendars from way back then, unaltered so they seem, with his activities on them

Like what kind of weird-o lists the times they had a threesome on their friends skippy and winko

hard evidence vs muddy words

hmmm

words ==more credible duh

I’m not really sure what kav means with all his metaphors

But i doubt someone would write on their calendars that they assaulted someone

Those could eaisly have been faked to cover his ass.

Just like her "memories"

Especially if he is a high ranking judge, when that sort of stuff could ruin his life

Her "memories" are even more easily faked