that contradicts the china

lol

This is just bad history friend

Depends on the timeframe

Fall of Rome--------->Enlightenment

This video is fantastic if you want to know more about the ice age, little ice age, and climate change in general: https://youtu.be/G0Cp7DrvNLQ

They also cite inventions post dark ages

This is a large span of time

My main point

This article is all jacked

THE ENLIGHTMENT DID NOT MAGICALLY APPEAR

it was built on by the Science and engineering and philosophy that happened during the socalled "dark Ages"

You also realize post fall of rome. Spain and france were invaded by the moors. Whome had trade with their islamic brothers who ran the silk road

Oh, the video also talks about the enlightenment period.

It said that there was a period of time where the climate was super awesome for growing food and in general not having a hard time. It gave people a better food amount and more time to think about stuff.

Yes there was some. I never denied that. I stated it was only clergy. The rest of the citizenry was busy trying to survive

"Only Clergy"

Well, it has been shown that an increase in food leads to an increase in the populace, which leads to an increase in specialization

You mean the people who did Science engineering and Philosophy🤦🏿 in that time frame

The cold period between romes warm period, and the enlightenments warm period. Constant wars. And the plague gave to much for common citizenry to worry about

"Constant Wars"

And the clergy didnt share often

The bottom end of the Maslow's Hierachy of Needs illustrates well just how money/resources works into advancement of individuals and society as a whole.

Pope Urban the Second Unified Europe like it never had before

Yes of the vying warlords trying to get their piece, the moor invasion, viking raids

More food, housing, safety, etc. leads to more time doing other stuff.

Everything past the bare minimum is only allowed because efficiency of food, housing, and safety production.

Europe was a mess after the fall of rome politically. It left a huge power vacuum

Change my mind: The Holy Roman Empire was better at managing Europe than the EU

That is a hard pick

Probably never studdied much of the hre

hre?

But i know my roman and the fall

Holy roman empire

You already off to a bad start

If managing means stability, sure. If managing means a good place to exist? Nope.

with why it fell

Lol the fall began with julies not relenquishing the emperitor role. And a series of events after continued this

<:pepe_eyes:378719408362881024>

Holy Shit

Can you not speak in enlightenment narratives