i read that bit about natural law, still can't get my head around it

probably because i'm not in the right mindset

@nyuuns2 Alright, what's your question

i just read over the last bit of that convo, and it's clear that you dont get it

I do not believe that morality can be called objective, because it does not exist beyond us. If that makes sense.

less of a question and more of a feeling of not understanding

What confuses you?

but then again, i should have been asleep for quite a while now

ohhh

you need sleep to think

Well, I'm sort of the local expert on natural rights here, so ttyl

woke at 10am and its 3am now

also completely ignoring the sociology class in hs didn't help

It probably did

i thought that thing wasn't helpful

Yours probably would have ruined you

They taught that shit in highschool where you live?

just for a year and one single class only

once a week

and i think it was in 2nd year?

it was also a private school

Dunno if I am lucky or was not well educated by modern standards lol

It was probably about positive rights, and marxism, and other junk

probably

i remember one of the contents was about socrates or something

it was waaaaaaay too long ago

8 years i think

That sounds more like Philosophy.

that

it was that

Philosophy is great

@nyuuns2 Anyways, go to bed on this:

The most important right you have, is the right to self defense.

And with that right, comes a responsibility to defend yourself.

Surprised they taught it in highschool though

too bad that i think my school book is back at my mom's

i agree with that fitzy

Literally everything else derives from that

its just that if you get someone else involved then i think things need to be relative

Unless you want to die but, then I won't sympathize

or else i can't seem to wrap my head around it

Nothing relative about defending your personal property

it was more on the angle of morals