Dunno if I am lucky or was not well educated by modern standards lol

It was probably about positive rights, and marxism, and other junk

probably

i remember one of the contents was about socrates or something

it was waaaaaaay too long ago

8 years i think

That sounds more like Philosophy.

that

it was that

Philosophy is great

@nyuuns2 Anyways, go to bed on this:

The most important right you have, is the right to self defense.

And with that right, comes a responsibility to defend yourself.

Surprised they taught it in highschool though

too bad that i think my school book is back at my mom's

i agree with that fitzy

Literally everything else derives from that

its just that if you get someone else involved then i think things need to be relative

Unless you want to die but, then I won't sympathize

or else i can't seem to wrap my head around it

Nothing relative about defending your personal property

it was more on the angle of morals

rather than rights

Did you agree not to previously, or agree that it would transfer ownership?

Ahh, yeah.

That's literally a 3000 year old debate dude

if someone attacks you for no reason, then you have the moral high ground at that point

True

as i said, i agree with that

its the other things that befuddle me

Which is why I find pacifists to be abominations

well that is the whole morality of it really

^

Derive

not today

Non-aggression principle

No I mean the ones that will let themselves die. And ALLOW theor family to be murdered.

I think he was replying to the Brazilian

i was

Like that one settlement on the western edges of the American colonies

The father wouldnt use his rifle to fight back

not familiar with that

Infuriated me for some reason

Like I was ANGRY