The british have that, its just spread out among many laws and legal precidents

Instead of 1 document

that definition needs to be much more simplified

I think

That does not mean anything though. Precedent can be overlooked.

Laws often conflict.

Um not easily

See scotus

And laws conflict here too

That shit happens everywhere

They do but we have a higher set of laws to fall back to.

Which is a constitution.

We have laws that conflict with the constitution, but are still upheld.

a lot of the gun laws comes to my mind

And we can overlook said laws.

Just nobody wants to

I would be within my god given rights to buy an artillery piece to blow up a cow if I damn wanted

No you cant oberlook laws just because you dont agree with it

it not that easy. it a reason it can take years or decades to get a final judgment on conflicting laws

And if they said otherwise, well, I have an artillery piece. They will say I can't, but I can. They will take it. But they will also be in the wrong,

Yes you can

IF the Constitution d8sagrees

The Cojstitution is the uktimate Law of the Land. It is the law from which all others derive authority.

,lmao

You still get fines and arrested/charged. As pointed gun laws.

Which are not constitutional.

It's not unheard of for people to own and fire cannons. Had a neighbor that did just that. True he wasnt firing at any one.

Upheld by scotus

Which can be challenged.

By who?

SCOTUS and a gun.

Scotus is the highest court.

Scotus has upheld the machine gun ban for decades

For instance

I am loyal only to the Constitution, and I interpret it literally. I did away with religion. You could call it my holy book.

....

Anything made by man has flaws.

^

I do not care if some tyrant wants to pretend that the Constitution stopped meaning what it says.

It still says it.

Cool. Go on a 1 man rebellion when the atf comes for your illigal machine guns.