u shut up retard

no u

move to <#372513679964635138> you fucking dipshits

The whole point of this argument: You've never even THOUGHT about the possibility that there's an alternative.

<:oof:494878589406150657>

go play fortnite or some shit

go to gay baby jail

Every debate is pointless. This dudes still gonna think his McDonalds brand security will save his ass at the end of it. Just wanted to see his thinking.

u dont liek the chat you can get out

Probably do a better job than Detroit's police kek

Maybe. But thats hardly a good metric to base your self off of.

That's EXACTLY the metric I'm basing this off of.

Total gov't control vs private solutions and voluntary interactions

For the record, ive thought of these things a long time before. That's why im conviced theyre wrong

@Fitzydog
>detriot
>police

what police?

<:oof:494878589406150657>

The only thing they protect and serve is the democratic mayor

Because im sure the best police in the world are private. After all the worst are government so duuuh

Yes, some of the best ARE private

Name 1

The Pinkerton's made a name for themselves

It has to gaurd more then 1 dudes house fyi

Hell, they were the secret service before we had one

so goys, what do you think about Smash Bros DLC

Pinkertons? Didnt they illegally bust unions? Great.

I'd like to see Jamal Khashoggi's liquefied corpse as a character

Good example.

"illegally"

Actually didnt think of that.

@Werlf who's that?

Im not joking when I say good example. I just dont see how thats any better then what we have now.

Did you miss all of the last month>

And it was illigal wasnt it? Thats why they didnt use state police. I dont know much of it myself

Because these options are not monoplized based on geographic area, and thus have to perform better if they wish to stay in business.

Something the police does NOT have to do

Main issue with political views which advocate essentially the toppling of an entire system and replacing it with something else is that it is so fundamental one cannot discuss anything else. There's no avenue to talk about improving the current system when surrounded by people who want to just wipe it away. The idea that someone is competent enough to be correct in their choice of what to replace a system that has been slowly developed for centuries with is just absurd. It's the age old problem of comparison, in that people compare the state of affairs in the present with an imaginary wish, which by nature has to ignore most of the variables and assume x would really be like y if their beliefs were practiced. I don't think you can advocate the destruction of the western system without being a clown, frankly. It's barely even worth addressing.

I didn't advocate for toppling anything, fyi

I just want the chance to put a govt monopolized institution out of business lol

Im surprised you dont have a better example then a group that busted some unions on behalf of industrialists as the basis for public security

Unless the pinkertons were patrolling more neighborhoods then ive been led to believe

There's not much market for private security when it's monopolized with tax subsidies