the power company has NO RIGHT to monitor my electricity usage

<:think_woke:378717098681171988>

night! <:GWcmeisterPeepoLove:403295311189245952>

"Sustainable development" is a keyword for "Kick people off privately owned land, and force them to rent in the city"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2I37RT3TCo

This video brought to you by conspiracy gang

woke pencilneck

<:think_woke:378717098681171988>

city livin is cancer

Oh is it?

Here, take these pills 💊

danny devito pikachu

IM FULL OF ANGRY NOW <:alex_jones:453626940021276672>

<:alex_jones:453626940021276672>

Lol, amusing to see a guy turn an initiative for nature conservation into a plot for a world government bent on human erasure.

"nature conservation"

I mean, can you discredit what he's saying?

all i can do is <:alex_jones:453626940021276672>

absolute mad lad

Down the rabbit hole, eh?

yep see you in the looney bin

@Fitzydog all he really said was that there are plans to divvy up land in North America as set aside for biodiversity. That it has been agreed to by the then president of the USA. It is a concern for the environment. He didn't present anything about a world government running everything, but an initiative by the UN with multiple other organisations and cooperation from world leaders to do something about biodiversity. There's nothing to discredit other than to say what he talked about in terms of evidence does not lay out what he started by saying, that the world government is here.

Okay, but if you've been paying attention even a little bit to how the EU and UN work, you'd know exactly what they're saying by reading their rhetoric

>UN
>not being world government
<:thronk:441701565607444482>

>divvy up land in North America as set aside for biodiversity. That it has been agreed to by the then president of the USA.

<:thronk:441701565607444482>

It's not their land to divvy up

just because its a conspiracy theory doesnt rule out its possible truth

Haha, the UN can't do shit. They can propose things and ask for cooperation from the actual governments of nations.

but if we cooperate, thats bad, and we have, so. . . ?

^

LOOK AT THE SCARY MAP

Everyone EXCEPT the US is cooperating

fuck the paris climate accord

Why is it bad to do nature conservation? I mean this was proposed and apparently adopted during the Bush era, hasn't devastated American society has it? It is a huge place with most of it having barely anybody living there. Vast areas of land with barely a cabin.

you could effectively be trapped in a city with no clearance to go anwhere else

It's not bad to do conservation