Message from @AlephKnoll

Discord ID: 521032692352024581


2018-12-08 18:30:19 UTC  

NATO exists entirely for eastern Europe and Germany

2018-12-08 18:31:54 UTC  

I understand that, but a lot of those European countries (France included) don't pay the 2% into their military like they're supposed to. Trump would be completely justified if you didn't get involved over there if they weren't in NATO.

2018-12-08 18:32:11 UTC  

The world isn't a game of Risk. Wars are almost always a lose/lose situation for both sides

2018-12-08 18:32:23 UTC  

Russia has no reason to even touch Western europe

2018-12-08 18:32:46 UTC  

Ukraine has justification historically

2018-12-08 18:33:07 UTC  

I wouldn't say its RIGHT, but there is precedence

2018-12-08 18:34:34 UTC  

Crimea would be like the US and Canada fighting over Vancouver Island.

2018-12-08 18:34:46 UTC  

it doesn't have to be Russia though.

2018-12-08 18:34:55 UTC  

it could be China.

2018-12-08 18:34:59 UTC  

it could be Turkey.

2018-12-08 18:35:05 UTC  

it could be SA.

2018-12-08 18:35:37 UTC  

if any nation attacks france should they leave NATO, NATO doesn't/ won't come to their aid. they aren't required to.

2018-12-08 18:35:44 UTC  

You're absolutely right.

And a country who isn't willing to defend itself, is not a country I'm willing to protect for them on their behalf

2018-12-08 18:36:12 UTC  

But you aren't the one making that decision.

2018-12-08 18:36:17 UTC  

none of us are.

2018-12-08 18:36:32 UTC  

it is stupid for them to *demand* to leave NATO.

2018-12-08 18:36:48 UTC  

Also, treaties are not like a line of code/a program.

2018-12-08 18:36:48 UTC  

if they are actually french.

2018-12-08 18:37:39 UTC  

ok... but that doesn't mean that we are still going to come to their defence if they aren't a part of NATO.

2018-12-08 18:37:54 UTC  

NATO would require us to come to their aid if something happened.

2018-12-08 18:37:58 UTC  

It doesn't mean the opposite either

2018-12-08 18:37:59 UTC  

salvini gattini

2018-12-08 18:38:05 UTC  

why would you want to get rid of that protection?

2018-12-08 18:38:08 UTC  

<:PepestanPenis:479767811246391325>

2018-12-08 18:38:16 UTC  

HAHA

2018-12-08 18:38:24 UTC  

You're making the assumption that if NATO doesn't exist, no one will help them

2018-12-08 18:38:25 UTC  

Bepis

2018-12-08 18:38:44 UTC  

<:gay:382982146249326612>

2018-12-08 18:38:47 UTC  

no, I'm saying that if they aren't a part of NATO, then we can choose to aid them or not.

2018-12-08 18:38:57 UTC  

<:pepsi:352636557548584962>

2018-12-08 18:38:59 UTC  

but if they remain a part of NATO, we **have** to come to their aid.

2018-12-08 18:39:10 UTC  

why would you take that chance?

2018-12-08 18:39:10 UTC  

I don't see the difference really.

2018-12-08 18:39:58 UTC  

The current situation ***requires*** us to take action. should they leave NATO, ***NATO may not come to their defence***.

2018-12-08 18:40:10 UTC  

NATO stipulates that you cannot provocate a war, and expect allies

2018-12-08 18:40:12 UTC  
2018-12-08 18:40:21 UTC  

thats irrelevant.

2018-12-08 18:40:35 UTC  

It says nothing about rolling over and saying "INVADE ME SENPAI!!"

2018-12-08 18:41:07 UTC  

Thats not my argument.

2018-12-08 18:41:18 UTC  

@AlephKnoll It's mine. now listen