Message from @The-Free-Monk
Discord ID: 655795559008960532
They lived off whatever they could catch and domesticate
Human progress and evolution necessarily entails destruction of other species
Construction, mining, logging, fishing , agriculture, power plants, textile mills etc
All of these involve killing numerous species by destroying their natural habitat and ecosystem
We are way past unnecessary harm
We have probably caused millions to go extinct without even realising
Like you said, our morality never evolved to satisfy the laws of logic.
They are not mathematical systems that are internally consistent at all times.
We could have a moral system where people say they don't want to eat meat to minimize harm to animals while turning a blind eye to other forms of harm to animals.
In that sense you could say the vegans have an excellent example of an internally inconsistent morality.
I think we could even imagine a genetic reason behind this. Maybe people who are genetically predisposed to not want to harm animals are more likely to engage in animal husbandry which has been a huge asset for human society for thousands of years. Maybe the logic behind this morality is not consistent but that's ok right?
one can also argue that any moral system that arbitrarily discrminates between animals and plants, is bankrupt.
Vegans must ignore the reality of plant life, whilst hypocritically upholding the sanctity of animal life. It is retarded.
aren't you presupposing that a moral system has to be logical then? That would contradict Super Monk's position @oojimaflip
No, I don't think so.... A moral system only has to be internally consistent to be valid, internal consistency does not *have to* derive from logic. Morality can be bat-shit insane but still internally consistent. @Boniface
I suppose you disagree with monk and I then, I don't think morality has to be internally consistent. @oojimaflip
Not really, I think most people's attempts at morality fail to be internally consistent. It doesn't mean it ceases to be a moral system, it just is one that I disagree with.
to be fair though, the only internally consistent moral system I do agree with is moral nihilism.
Livestock farming was an essential survival tool
All you could grow are animal offspring
Unless irrigation canals were set up
But that technology is very recent
would gas lighting be considered a fake moral signal?
🤔 great question
its quite black pilling to hear about JF being stabbed in the back by malicious females
do you think Islamic societies create stronger moral signals than other civilizations when it comes to punishing and and restricting the malicious aspects of female nature
?
hopefully one day JFs kids find his YT videos and became based and redpilled
my strategy for dealing with corrupt court systems would be to create a parallel system of justice
something along the lines of sharia courts
that will take full responsibility for cases pertaining to family law
If a nuclear war broke out across the western world and only European people’s were left
It would look Islamic when we start rebuilding civilization
Not because we would convert, but because women have destroyed a lot of trust in society
So when shit hits the fan, there will be serious restrictions on women
They’ll be lucky if it doesn’t resemble Somalia at the end of it tbh
Because if you’re the chad 20% pumping women you know first hand, how much faith you should put in on your wife *not* cucking you
With another chad
Same goes for the bottom 80% virgins