Message from @Boniface
Discord ID: 664808712262778880
does anyone know where you can find good data breakdowns on welfare recipients in the US
an actual dot.gov website might have some info. something related to bureau of labor statistics? @Fully Buckminstered
Tell me Islam isn't based
inshallah
are you muslim?
maybe eventually
why 2% liberty?
are you aiming for something like, north korean style?
political tests are dumb
meh, if it can lead to some fun banter I don't mind
But yeah, nonexistant liberty, forced allocation, it sounds like a kind of system where the population is enslaved by the state and made to work for the ruling family so they can live in a big palace while the population struggles and goes in a concentration camp if they resist. lol
<:Yes:639977935209627658>
sounds dystopian to me
I used to be much more open to the idea of collectivism, until I started working in an asian restaurant with a strong collectivist ethic and I started seeing the seams pretty quickly.
What at first glanced seemed like a lack of individualism still had individualism in it, it was just concentrated.
Everyone in the group was in theory working towards a common goal, the good of the group.
But the person at the top of the group got to decide what is good for the group.
And all you have to do is have that person corrupted and the whole thing rots.
Get them addicted to gambling or something and have the whole group feed that addiction "for the good of the group" and you have a fucking shitshow on your hands.
I understand someone not wanting complete liberty but complete collectivism just seems so easy to subvert you just need to corrupt the person at the top the whole thing rots.
Yeah it’s called balance
You don’t want the top to be too too heavy
You want the bottom to be able to hold them to account
That’s why a group needs a common ethic and goal
Loyalty is good but not submitting yourself as a slave to someone’s whims
Hello, i would like to see a show, going trough UN and EU- documents. Showing the importing of Migrants as a 'deliberate policy to offset aging population'. UN seems very blatant about it. EU is more sublte and vague about it, perhaps not in the least because the EU blocks lacks argeement on the subject between its member states, especially east v.s. western europe. And overall failure to deal with mass migration. Although in one document i see they just assumed mass migration would continue at the same pace it has been in the recent years.
well, the UN has it's replacement migration webpages. can you link to anything from the EU?
Yes i seen the replacement migration page
I send you what i found about the EU
Nick Griffin ?
https://youtu.be/X3-_KZExlJ0 Why did Swedes let the feminists ruin the country so much
pussy is too powerful