Message from @TuerSchlossEnteiser
Discord ID: 675448643305734144
The American revolution was not just a rebellion against the monarchy of Great Britain. This is least of all significant. Justifying this rebellion was the intent to establish a republic along an imposing liberal paradigm. Its leaders simply did what was necessary, with the opportunity available, and with what could be capitalized upon as the world became increasingly transformed by a Liberal imperative to prepare for the inevitable future setting we live now. To say that America is a Liberal nation is total disregard for its reason to be founded. To say any nation can be truly liberal is total disregard for a nation’s purpose for existence. Therefor what America was and is, where it exists by its true form, is the proper adaptation by a distinct people among a paradigm of Liberal policy to form a state of order for continued survival and prosperity. The success of this nation must continue and not just conserve. The time of American geoisolation has ended where those of similarity everywhere are in great need of each other. The limits of reach extend to the farthest observable star, not by what is propositioned in an era where everyone is everywhere, and by people who just so happen to be present within geographic vicinity but not share true intentions. Be not compelled by those who act in faith disassociated by vulgar substitutions of our righteous inheritance.
A true opposition to modern liberal policy has begun to shape modern political form. Liberalism itself cannot exist in recognition without something equal to oppose. It requires a symbolic opposition to validate its own symbolic existence. When an untrue opposition to Liberalism achieves recognition, it amplifies untrue characteristics of what that opposition opposes. Like two opponents who face each other in combat, their actions are a signal to each other of their worthiness. Current and past Liberal policy has succeeded for so long to vail its true characteristics by controlling what opposes it at the expense of destroying its own authenticity. This true opposition is upon us to fulfill and Liberalism will fail to prevent it.
Nurture Is an expression of nature. Communication IS organization emergent. The likelihood any two people who share truth effectively will share common ancestry, is explanation for why people self organize among the identity they share communicatively. The origins of the diversity of language is congruent with the genesis of ethnicity where by systems form spontaneously within a sequence whose interior is a reduction of complexity (order). A system of formality does not order itself complete and consistently, but is rather the product of continuous human Will proclaimed upon it’s sequence of transmissions informed by post-rational sets of initial axioms that unfold to signal the most legitimate format recognizable to the whole. Thus morality is indistinguishable from shared human agency. It is that common medium through which truth is abstracted and expressed throughout institution as legitimate progression of knowledge. Our collective Will is the energy which compels a state of change to progress in the direction of our agency. The name of the game is to exist in the future where that which continues must change by moving forward. If a people desire to prevail within a spiritual struggle, they must achieve the morality which justifies victory.
A nation is the binding force of human symbiosis wherever it is an expression of power where: (a) Power is the ability to cooperate for a common purpose that is perceived morally legitimate, and where: (b) This power coincides with actions expressed as intent to achieve political outcomes. Our opposition defines itself willingly as an adversary to distinct systems of people who exercise shared intentions outside the direct benefit of illegitimate representatives of our hierarchy.
1. Lead your opposition to oppose a powerful symbol, this is how to control them as they seek something to give their efforts justification. The symbology that represents this matters to the extent it invokes reverence in the people it relates to. To Choose a losing symbol is choosing to be ignored
2. Be not an enemy to people your objective is to unify. A failure to see the benefit of cooperation is a consequence of imaginary boundaries imposed by self limitation. Inspire a person by convincing them to win and identify where they have chosen freely to lose
3. We live to fulfill our purpose. The objective of warfare is not warfare. It’s objectification is the internalization of failure and losers are never recognized for any purpose other than their defeat. Power for the sake of power is to expend resources where there is nothing to gain. Radicalism for the sake of being radical is the normal behavior of a nihilist. You can get that from a number of different places.
this guy's advice reminds me of banjod.
https://youtu.be/205q9Xa2Qng?t=110
must be a norwegian thing <:goldpill:626276664837537833>
The 6 million that were first persecuted by Hitler, was it Hitler that started the persecution of the Jews in Europe?
NO, 1915 first persecution of Jews was in Russia "6 Million Jews throughout Russia, reported by the Russian Government are being persecuted, rounded up, starved, tortured. Thousands have been slaughtered and driven from towns throughout Russia." 18 years before Hitler stepped foot in Government in Germany. 1918 NY Times, 6 million jews need help, 1,000,000,000 needed to rebuild Jewry. NY Times 1919, Ukrainian Jews persecuted, 6 million persecuted and in need of help in Ukraine and Poland. 6 million again and again, why is it that we look at what Hitler did to the jews, when the rest of Europe were rounding up Jews and killing and exterminating them long before Hitler.
An excellent introduction to fire ecology
Oh shit I did not read the pervious comment, the video I posted has nothing to do with the previous comment(not like anyone will believe me)
s'all good 😄
<:jewlol:640697573853626378> ♦️ 💠 🔫 🤯
Who is this Joachim guy?
I think he was part of the gas station that got shut down by cantwell?
heel turn
On Mosley and the influence to the EU.
Unnecessary advantage
they should earn far fewer degrees than men because of their lower presence in the higher ends of the IQ curve
that they earn higher than men shows the gynocentrism of academia
and the uselessness of most degrees
aka they are too easy to obtain to really be worth much
also women getting degrees is **bad** for society
no, them not having kids by 35 is bad for society
Which is prevented by them investing their time into education (which, most women do not seek wisely) instead of family building and child rearing
<:big_brained:396156349676781569>
Semiogogue tends to look at things way too deeply
most people only look at pragmatic outcomes and will support whatever system someone claims will deliver them that outcome at low cost and low consequences to themselves.