whoever sacrifices private liberty for safety deserves (nor will have) neither private liberty nor security

we are stronger together
so we can use collective will and might makes right
to create RIGHTS
... this is a state

its a stupid trade

"For temporary safety"

becaus you can litrally use your private liberty to provide for your security

Read the proper quote

while not the other way around

the state = we are stronger together than the libtard who always must defend himself

temporary is shorter than longterm

if you dont have temporary

how will you have longtrm

@Chawosaurian

respond to Mongols..
the mongols would kill YOU

thats like saying

well we wont have 5 mins

but we will have 5 hours

trust me goy

@Chawosaurian
how would you defend against the MONGOLS

An army of a thousand trannies even when equipped with the entire arsenal of Western nations will find it tough going against even 12 of those Russian Spetsnaz guys who grew up wrestling in the backyard of their churches since they were 6

with weaponsa/

what else

lowering taxes and dencentral

like eriously why do centritards think only their stupid thug entity can protect us from stuff

@Chawosaurian
with a big state

ye man

we need enough thugs

that'll do it

the only way you can defend against mongols
is with a big state = army

its not like we can do it ourselves

> like eriously why do centritards think only their stupid thug entity can protect us from stuff
@Chawosaurian
Other entities can protect us from stuff

no

would techno hitler microwave them?

yes

and will do it bettr

the mongols are more and better warriors

many of them have an incentive to protect us

But it has to be a single entity in a given area

Did the mongols have a state with taxes or were they decentralized <:pepelaugh:640412982119235596>

the state has little incentive outside of what they can leech

no seriously

also

hmm me havent pushed back agains tthat