Because centritards need to buy out poors to stay in power and keep leeching

I am no curt
but I think It's possible in theory(although easily conquered) the main issue is that you'll have to sacrifice the commonwealth

certain types of parasitism will be allowed if the commons are not recognised as legitimate property

The most common description of propertarianism that I've been exposed to is that it's a completion of libertarian logic in the longterm with a broader definition of property
@Opsal

well, the gist of his argument is that property norms, like all norms, are a public good that has to be centrally enforced

just breed a slave caste that's suicidal when it loses its jobs

all property is public property, just with different amounts of autonomy delegated to it

be clever

the norm of property has to be enforced, and someone has to enforce it

which means they have to have the power to do so

Wished I was home

it's been a while, but I used to be a Propertarian

hmm

What made you rethink your position?

all these weird conceptions of property means no private property

centrally enforced bla

just means enslave everyone

and give the slaves a bit of autonomy so the central enforcer can leech better

im here

the problem is that it's essentially just cutting edge Liberalism, it doesn't transcend it

The info about Middle China an hour ago was wrong, but theres nothing I can do....

like you were talking about before of small federal governments

Propertarians are sympathetic

if we are going to have slavery just have it, not this stupid mental gymnastics

where Israel's critique was poignant, in that they'd just seek to expand

hurr durr we are trying to protect property goy not just enslave everyone

@Chawosaurian
yes.. private property only exists because you are part of a state

such private property is pretty fragile than

an entity which depends on there being no X to uphold X means X is dead

...defending against the mongol horde
means that you must build a strong big state
because you need a single big army
of proffessional soldiers

@Chawosaurian
Goodluck creating ancapistan

It's just a matter of time before centralized systems conquer yours

<:tucker:587843675413807106>

why centralize

I ultimately didn't rethink my position, I just went further than Curt is able to

why less efficiency

I use some ancap ideas in my fascism

things evolve to more efficiency not less

Cant build a strong army if your nation is divided

@Ed you've read anything about Neoabsolutism?

a strong army to oppress people

Small armies are not effective

huge armies are a massive sink hole of resources