Message from @Hector
Discord ID: 635540091967766547
'he must be right his story has such detail it cant have been made up'
😍 ✋🏻
Haha, ok, I think this is simple enough for you to understand. Perhaps, you have not thought of this yet.
But if God were real and was capable of revealing his self, there is literally no difference of probability in details.
3. Your third assumption is that religions are strictly men guessing. Going back to point 2., you assume there is not an interaction between God and man.
Saved
<:smugooze:398100987866251265>
😏
hektor so you have no proof either, thanks for making my point in other words
omnipotent omnipresence is indistinguishable from randomness
Your argument was that all religions are unlikely correct. I point why that argument is invalid.
So how did I prove your point?
I just think your argument is bogus. I am looking for a debate rn. Bored out of my mind.
it goes for all religions that they are very unlikely to be true
hektor
your syllogism is self referentially incoherent
this is basic logic
Tell me why?
u srs?
your premises refute your conclusion
Tell me why.
it isn't valid
because neither can prove their starting point: god
your premises refute your conclusion because it does not follow
it's a non sequitur
I was not proving God.
its just sall self referential lore
i cant get more simple than that you idiot
google search non sequitur dot com
it does not follow
with unknown beginning state
I just was saying that the logic he was using was not strong.
you have been BTFO'd bro
I know what a non sequitur is.
delete your acc
self