Message from @21ooAB
Discord ID: 635552128634716180
but here in the states
that is impossible
but given the low rates of mutation, a system where the majority can select against mutations is better
Were culturally encoded to be against your system
even if its the best
Once we collapse back to Darwinian selection, monarchy will be inevitable.
That won't happen imo
and republicanism is just more efficient and logical than direct democracy where the most capable represent
This discussion started with your bluepilled take that the left can't win the next election
Nope
so therefore i am republican
Democracy is gay. Uncle Hitty is disappointed.
@iippo How is being mortified that the left, with their utterly degenerate values and morals, ruling the country, bluepilled?
the Reich was a Republic
Swiss direct democracy is a million times better than your Jewish democracy
BURH
My idea is having an autocrat in power
READ WHAT I WROTE
and grooms him for it well in advance
Basically, the Byzantines
HITLER ROSE TO POWER VIA DEMOCRACY, AUTOCRACY WAS HIS TOOL TO SELECT AGAINST THE ENEMIES OF HIS IDEALS
with their co-emperorship system
Absolutism is 10x better than democracy.
Correct
Just because he arose from democracy doesn’t mean he supported it.
The most appropriate system is literally the one that serves you best relevant to the population
I prefer near aboslutism though
remember this
Where the King has supremacy but cannot legally execute people for his entertainment
Lmao. You guys don't even know what the right truly is. The Right is the supporters of the French Ancien-Regime
Democratists are bluepilled
etymologically
sure but these are your pref, and i laid out why i don't like monarchies you can't select against a single mutant leader who has all the power and when power is shared due to the low rates of mutation, the majority can always effectively select against the mutants each generation
That implies there will be no gradual outside influence
Outside influence will kill democracy