Message from @ALternativeToLife
Discord ID: 636133509614010368
You'd have to control for so many lifestyle choices
mega bowls of vegetables
LOL
ok ye retarded ppl eating bowls of lettuce
Amazing argument
The question is whether or not two people who live identical lifestyles except for meat consumption will have the vegan coming out more healthy
I doubt it
If you look at countries that eat more meat they live longer on average
no, if you look at the "blue zones" they eat lots of beans, fish and legumes
83-6691152a.pdf
Bruh, so much exogeneity
Lifestyle choices are a lot different than something intrinsic like race
Blue zones eat lot of animal products too
If you actually look at what they eat there
Discussion on the study
No longest average mortality are adventist Christians who are vegetarian
No the pescetarians were longest living from that group
Come on don't buy into this stupid vegan propaganda
lol
Post the study
Just go vegan if it's so healthy
vegan's not healthy
Then why aren't you vegan
Please tell me how, I will debunk as I've spent time doing before
Vegans debunk themselves by being malnourished soyboys
india is 31% vegetarian
I'm not vegan cause I don't need to be my cholesterol is very low
if you become a vegetarian, you'll shit in the streets
Truth
Correlation /= causation
any diet where you need additional vitamins and supplements means that we didn't evolve with it and isn't even natural
@ALternativeToLife look at the average age of the participants, I'd have to see how they control for age. They don't list a method
It's a big difference
borrebylation != caucasiation
There's another study about 50v50 closer age and 7% higher test I'll find it later
Living past 80 is overrated; it's pathetic and you'll turn into a vegetable <:kekboi:417880491182653450> might as well go out in a blaze of glory at age 45 <:dab:395562678153904128>
This one is a little strange, because depending on the smoothing factor for controls they could get the exact opposite result if you look at the 95CI on T and the p-value. The overlap is large which is why I assume the summary is worded as it is
dude just go to a vegan rally and you'll see how low test they are
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7599149/SoftBank-plans-pay-WeWork-founder-Adam-Neumann-200M-board-seat-voting-shares.html
From a $47B valuation to $10B.
There's some big money plays up for grabs over essentially bullshit
Well selection bias can't really be controlled for
Even a study of ~250 is about as good as it gets