Message from @nr
Discord ID: 636725548512575518
Or any baby photos from the 1910s 1920s and 1930s
@Str3tch is that the blonde bug eye girl?
Dude you wreak of leftist indoctrination
yeah
it went on until the 1960s
nah prove it
show me it was a normal
and wide spread
@Str3tch i love the meme about her
But there is a difference between dressing boys effeminately as a symbol of sexual innocence and trying to chemically castrate them and psychologically abusing them to convince them they're something they're not
hemingway ^
anecdotal not accepted
again
just google any famous person
we've had a few people stop by here the past couple days with a clear and admitted motive to try to "de-radicalize" the userbase.....
this guy is smoking some shit I want no part of
is jf alt right?
we have the abc article about the girl who left AIM......
Who are these people?
The VC people?
there's a big push on "deradicalization" right now
jf is alt-right in the eyes of people that censor
yeah, a few of the VC people
eternal entropy what is the threshold of proof you desire to convince you that it was common to treat children asexually until they became old enough to speak and understand whats going on
what is the Israeli navy called?
Was fixing to say. i didnt see any in chat.
its common knowledge btw, so nobody every questioning it or bothered with it
they insist that the "alt-right" purposefully recruits and targets young adults
i heard about banjod going off on some fools
I remember a few articles like a month ago saying how Contra Points is deradicalising right wingers lol
the discord got nuked
Figure that must have been them
so its getting dicey in here
Dressing boys as girls, in the early 20th and 19th centuries was supposed to be a symbol of sexual innocence
@nr Some kind of stats or written report in the time of this "occurence" validating that the elites have always been whacked sicko's
they refuse to acknowledge that people observing reality plays a role in 'red-pilling' ppl