@Deleted User

Ah. I suppose you are into dialectical materialism?

SENOR PORFAVOR!!!

@BUN come back to me squeaker

I've studied it but it's not my worldview

Hmmm

@M'beke don't lie, u love our women smh

u fokin shit ill kill u <:megacuck:630716817945526299> <:megacuck:630716817945526299>

I think a consequence-based ethic is dull and pointless

in fortnite

<a:intensify:586574984458010634>

i dont like any women

Hmmm. So what is your view then. Is everything a spook lol

<:CHAD:396569198404435969>

women dont have the balls to leave thier room without some sort of makeup, just remember that

Idk I just showed up here at the eleventh hour

To shit on libtards

Like nerth

I am nominally a moral nihilist in the vein of JF, but I have a morality that I understand to be spiritual and subjective

gay

so snowflake morality essentially? nothing is universal but whenever you need something it is of moral importance

the fact that a moral preference is not 'metaphysically obligatory' does not mean that it is any less legitimate imo

yes, Sacker of the West

I can unironically respect that

<:mlady:389497741769703424>

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/304814473242214410/631530920784166912/video0_13.mov

Alot of people hold the same morality you do, but they never want to admit it, the fact you are admitting it is chad.

and makes it acceptable

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

wrong chat

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

a lot of libertarians understand most of this, then they do this retarded metaethical thing where they say 'well if everyone's preferences are equally valid, therefore we should set society up such that everyone is best able to pursue their own preferences'

which doesn't follow at all

you can't draw any metaethical conclusions from it

I suppose I would agree

be catholic

be gay

i found the jew

Choose life.

choose death

Choose a television