@Deleted User well, the 13k migrants weren't the same as modern chinese, they just have a shared ancestor

My point is very simple

Guns germs and steel = cuckery

'why did China end up rich and Sub-Saharan Africa end up poor' <:kekboi:417880491182653450>

Why is Africa shit today?

Because of Africans

you are historically illiterate

they are said to be more siberian like following mamoths @Deleted User

If you’re arguing a nations success depends on genetics culture and geographic factors I don’t disagree

Imagine equating China to Africa

@Nerthulas answer the fucking question.

Lol

russian asian?

But if you say culture doesn’t matter at all that’s nonsensical

My sides

You can't answer it, so you resort to cheap insults.

I'm weak

Bruh

Why do you think we evolve culture and traditions because they have survival value

@BabygottBach BECAUSE THEY ARE LESS EVOLVED DUE TO NO CIVILIZATION

the answer is that they only developed civilization (with our help) in the last two centuries

also they may have bred with a monkey like species

compared to China, which developed civilization more than 9000 years ago

lesser homonoid the "ghost species"

I admire baby got Bach for presenting his thoughts to opposing sides while being outnumbered

jamal doesn't know the price of diamonds on the global market

@Deleted User Explain china's precipitous fall in the first place.

so he gets paid a dollar a day to mine them

Right or wrong that’s a difficult position to be in

the second reason, and these are not distinct, is that the Chinese have a much higher G-potential than the sub-saharans

@BabygottBach no

9000 year old civilization built independently by high-iq people vs 200 year old civilization built by foreigners

@Nerthulas, what is China's g potential compared to western European?

probably higher

they apparently have a higher IQ

so

though there's reason to believe those are falsified

why did Europeans outstrip the Chinese utterly?

or at least suspects

*suspect