Lol

there is a difference between having millions of people and your own capital and cities developed over thousands of years to serve a regional empire, vs some tools that the europeans brought over for the express purpose of exploiting your country

Maybe their attempt at socialism failed because it always fails everywhere it’s tried

boomer take

that being said, they mostly squandered what we left them

probably because they have low IQs

@Nerthulas, unless the Euros took the tools with them...

you can't take a railroad

Then it's back to genetics.

its both

It is

But both is genes

sub-saharan africans are not good at creating or maintaining to a civilization, all it's trappings, and everything it entails, to the standards that other populations are capapble of. you can see this in the diaspora as well

@BabygottBach How was Japan able to develop even though they failed to resist imperialism?

Africa was geopolitically fucked for a revolution.

Japan resisted imperialism much more effectively than China did

@iippo, as a bulwark to commie china

it's so incredibly in your face

possibly longer @BabygottBach

the shortcomings

the organization needed to even achieve is lacking

yes, it just happens by accident that everywhere they are it succ

it's magic

Correct

No

I think we're starting to get though to him, if only a little bit

It's socioeconomic circumstances

Not in the slightest

empires rise and fall, people are oppressed and liberated, they remain the same

@Banjod No banjod, it's colonialism

right, like the chinese

remember, he's Chinese not Jewish

or japanese

lol

or the koreans

Yeah black people fail in exactly the same ways all over the globe irrespective of histories of racism and slavery

why is it eastern europe recovered from socialism but africa didn't?

these were poor and became rich

Racism and slavery is the history of Africa