It's not just IQ

You are arguing from god of the gaps.

no, you don't understand

We explained it many times

nerthulas is my bf

We focus on IQ because it's important and we have a lot of data

"I need to see the quarks interacting for it to be true"

this guy

It's disposition

Social factors

Everything

Your argument against sociology is literally that you lack the the abiity to come up with a mechanism.

if your position were more likely, we'd expect the people raised together to be more alike than the twins raised apart, but we see exactly the opposite, and we see it very strongly @BabygottBach

bf above

You blanketly deny the most likely solution to say muh sociology

@Deleted User "I need to see the exact social mechanisms for it to be true" this guy

you're now trying to say its equvalent

you're conceding territory

but its not equivalent

@Nerthulas, that is false

@BabygottBach can you please address this?

The sociological effects may provide a confounding variable.

what do you mean by that?

What sociological effect

why are the twins more similar?

what genes?

LOL

Banjod posted about 600 of them I think

There may be a sociological effect that has not been accounted for

earlier

Twins raised apart being so much more similar to one another than another random set of people or the twin compared with another random sample from his own group utterly wrecks your entire position @BabygottBach

He did

what molecules do these genes code for, @Nerthulas ?

hahahah

and that sociological effect affects twins hundreds of miles apart to be similar @BabygottBach

?

how do these molecules interact with IQ?

see he used the kraut line

FIND THE GENES BIGOT

@Nerthulas, sure.

"There may be"