Message from @BabygottBach

Discord ID: 638991587531161627


2019-10-30 06:43:29 UTC  

Sociology is literally only able to survive so long as PC HR departments are around

2019-10-30 06:43:36 UTC  

@TheUserNameofPeace critique the study, sophist

2019-10-30 06:43:38 UTC  

Prove that

2019-10-30 06:43:39 UTC  

@BabygottBach I already defeated you

2019-10-30 06:43:42 UTC  

Show proof of that claim

2019-10-30 06:43:43 UTC  

You are just dogmatic

2019-10-30 06:43:45 UTC  

Won't change

2019-10-30 06:43:46 UTC  

No you haven't

2019-10-30 06:43:47 UTC  

Set piece

2019-10-30 06:43:52 UTC  

Your dogma is literally "sociology bad"

2019-10-30 06:43:54 UTC  

no proof

2019-10-30 06:44:02 UTC  

You haven't read any of the studies

2019-10-30 06:44:08 UTC  

you can't address the studies directly

2019-10-30 06:44:12 UTC  

Why are twin, separated at birth, so similar in every respect?

2019-10-30 06:44:20 UTC  

You still haven't confronted this

2019-10-30 06:44:21 UTC  

All you have are parthetic, pitiful, ad hom attacks on sociology

2019-10-30 06:44:21 UTC  

we show that many characteristics of objectively shared environments significantly moderate the effects of nonshared environments on adolescent academic achievement and verbal intelligence, violating the additivity assumption of behavioral genetic methods.

2019-10-30 06:44:22 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/638991571424903169/nycpwd8kwkv31.png

2019-10-30 06:44:23 UTC  

Oh my

2019-10-30 06:44:25 UTC  

this doesn't make any sense to me

2019-10-30 06:44:26 UTC  

nice deflection

2019-10-30 06:44:27 UTC  

***Separated at birth***

2019-10-30 06:44:33 UTC  

Your study is arguing that environment has a real effect, not that genetics dont

2019-10-30 06:44:34 UTC  

Nice deflection @TheUserNameofPeace

2019-10-30 06:44:37 UTC  

I've brought this up, as have others, dozens of times

2019-10-30 06:44:38 UTC  

Dozens

2019-10-30 06:44:43 UTC  

You just ignore

2019-10-30 06:44:47 UTC  

where's your devastating critique of the sociological studies

2019-10-30 06:44:53 UTC  

` Using monozygotic twin fixed effects models, which compare outcomes among genetically identical pairs, we show that many characteristics of objectively shared environments significantly moderate the effects of nonshared environments on adolescent academic achievement and verbal intelligence, violating the additivity assumption of behavioral genetic methods. `

2019-10-30 06:45:00 UTC  

I'm proving the opposite

2019-10-30 06:45:01 UTC  

there's your fucking sociological explanation

2019-10-30 06:45:15 UTC  

That genes are heritable and playing the major role

2019-10-30 06:45:18 UTC  

how can an (environment) moderating the effects of an (environment) on intelligence measures violate the additivity assumption of (genetics)?

2019-10-30 06:45:28 UTC  

can you answer this for me please?

2019-10-30 06:45:28 UTC  

Objectively shared environments moderate the effects of nonshared environment

2019-10-30 06:45:32 UTC  

Why don't you

2019-10-30 06:45:33 UTC  

READ

2019-10-30 06:45:35 UTC  

THE STUDY

2019-10-30 06:45:35 UTC  

those are both environments

2019-10-30 06:45:42 UTC  

Tell me what you think is wrong with it

2019-10-30 06:45:48 UTC  

at this point, I've not read the study