Message from @Roko
Discord ID: 640086681202196491
They have those epicanthic folds
He keeps posting my waifu
<:REEEE:640033860067000350>
God bless the chosen people
Pokemon
She's nice
@TheUserNameofPeace you haven't addressed the nature problem. One can put nature first and die.
@Trommm I'm not addressing it now but I am aware and have confronted it many times
There are a lot of problems
Luther < Peter
I have a tentative solution but I'm not sure how bulletproof it is
Your foundations have to all be consistent
And you need to make sure they can't go where you don't want them to in a few generations
It's pretty challenging to maintain some of what you (and I also may) want whilst avoiding more aggressive progressivism or strong transhumanism that leads to mass slavery
The more I consider it, the more I suspect the elite globalist are right
only thing is, I'm not sure they're gonna win
They are right from their perspective.
what I would do is keep the population high for war, remove my enemies, lower population, do eugenics
Read Brave New World
That's what they have in mind for you
do they lower the population in brave new world?
I read BNW a few months ago, and was amazed at how much it described the present.
Told ya
And written in the 20s
Yeah.
Huxley borrowed heavily from Russell's book, *The Scientific Outlook*
It's *faction*
do they talk about lowering population in the book?
Yes Ban
how much
@Wan6Saber I dig that aesthetic
Impressionism and futurism 🤔
All the globalist literature has talked about this since the 19th Century
You need to do some reading
You can't come to a kneejerk assessment
I can't have my view of what I would do?
Population isn't the issue. 500 mil globally is fine.
It's the genetic control that is disgusting.
Started with Malthus, I'd say